Chris Moritz
speaker
332 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Apr 2025
Chris Moritz’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
And she is the right face that qualified for, you know, hit the quotas that are necessary in California to advance. And therefore, we see in her this shell of a person. Always talking about herself. Of course. That's the only thing she thinks about. Right. But it's always... You know her book's called Smart Crime? Yeah. Can you please use air quotes around the word book? Yeah.
Well, actually, it was ghostwritten. You think? And plagiarized.
The chapter in my book on her, I call the banality of evil. Yeah. And it's the sense that these actions or inactions, rather, over time that seem incremental lead to outcomes that actually produce incredible evil and violence. Exactly. And though she is not pulling the trigger, right?
She's not even passing some of the laws I hope I can get to, which are even more insane than what I've already told you. But she nevertheless is part of this machine. And she's also tied to the Gettys, by the way, just incidentally. They all are. Pelosi's, Gettys, Newsom, Brown's, like, it's all the same. Willie Brown, too, of course.
And so there's nothing, there are no accomplishments to speak of. And nothing changed when she was vice president.
I've got to stop sidetracking. So after Prop 57, 2016, that passes, we jump ahead to 2020, where I think everything broke down across the world, but especially in the United States and especially in California. And as a result of the George Floyd attack,
um riots which by the way all of the law enforcement officers i've talked to who were there and were there for the 1992 riots say these two cannot even be closely compared gangsters in la during the george floyd riots were laughing their asses off because they didn't give a excuse me a about george floyd uh at all they everyone knew he was just a some armed robber drives with fentanyl exactly a revolution okay exactly and
Oh, by the way, the guy who robbed us on the police report, it says like any drugs or you're on any drugs. And he writes in like crayon fentanyl. He's on fentanyl? Yeah. Yeah. He's on fentanyl. Everyone's on fentanyl. In the criminal world. It's like salt. They're on fentanyl? Yeah. It's like salt. Well, he was taking it because he had been stabbed like a year or two before.
And so he takes it for the pain and to stay level when he's doing carpentry and not
I mean, I love laughing gas. I had that once.
Well, that's what we see. That's why it's the zombie apocalypse, right?
But, so, after the riots, and there was a momentous push for... Again, I call it crime equity legislation. And this took the form of two laws that have been absolutely devastating. And I think that they probably will ultimately get thrown out by the Supreme Court because they're so egregious. The first is called the Racial Justice Act of 2020.
And the Racial Justice Act of 2020 allows defendants – and it's retroactive – to challenge their convictions based on the presence of bias or racial animus by, let's say, anyone involved in the trial or on the police side. Now, that doesn't have to have any bearing on whether or not the evidence supports their guilt at all. These can be guilty people. The evidence proved beyond a doubt.
But if there was a white racist involved at any level... They can get their convictions thrown out under the Racial Justice Act or reduced significantly. And this happened in the city of Antioch. It's called the Antioch texting scandal. Four young black gang members were on trial for attempted murder and murder and very clear that they did it.
Gang enhancements were applied to them, which would mean that they were going to face a lot more jail time. But at the same time, it came out that the police officers in Antioch were texting racist, so-called racist messages to each other in private, not as part of the job, not relating to even their involvement in the case, but just about these defendants. And when this came out,
the judge presiding over the case uh utilized the racial justice act and threw out all the gang enhancements against so they had no longer killed anybody because the cops were mean let me tell you how much worse it gets defense attorneys can use statistical evidence nebulous statistical evidence of racial disparity to support the case
and satisfy their burden of proof that there is racial injustice. So for instance, if a jurisdiction is applying gang enhancements in greater proportion to black gang members than to some other group. White gang members? Yeah, whatever those are. And under the Racial Justice Act, the statistical differences can be entered into consideration by the judge on whether or not to apply the RJA.
That's just like the end of civilization. It gets worse. Um, the same year they, the Sacramento pass AB 3070, AB 3070, um, took away the ability of prosecutors to apply peremptory challenges to prospective jurors on the basis of bias. So for instance, up until AB 3070,
you could, if a juror would say, you know, my son had been involved with, had been arrested, or I have a negative opinion of police, so on and so forth, this would be a cause by which a prosecutor could use a peremptory challenge to remove the juror. Well, under AB 3070, if this juror is a member of a protected group, which by the way includes gender identity. So like training criminals?
Well, no, no. Training jurors. Oh, okay. Yeah. Um, They can no longer use peremptory challenges against them, even if they say, I hate cops because they're a protected group. So the result of this is, as one of the top prosecutors in the entire state told me, is the proliferation of OJ juries.
Showing 301–320 of 332 · page 16 of 17
← Previous
Next →