Chris Murphy

That's false.

Well, I'll give you an example.

So there's a prenatal vitamin called WeNatal.

Your filings before this committee show that you started receiving compensation in the spring of 2024.

And yet in September of 2024, you posted a video saying that you had no financial relationship to the company, just a big fan.

And then in October, you said, not sponsored, just love these.

But in fact, you have documentation before this committee that showed when you said those things, you had a financial relationship.

You had already started receiving money from that company.

So you weren't telling the truth when you said you were just a fan.

You were actually receiving money, correct?

But you had noticed the use of at that time.

Received partnership fees for this particular prenatal vitamin.

In fact, prior to September and October, you had posted partnership links in which you get compensated based upon click-throughs, correct?

Speaker 2 Speaker 1 Function health, which is your lab testing platform data shows that

with them less than a third of the time that you recommended their services online.

Genova Diagnostics, you disclosed your sponsorship in only two of the nine times that you promoted Genova.

Daily Harvest, you disclosed your sponsorship in only three of the 14 posts recommending that product.

Zen Basil Seeds, you disclosed your partnership only two out of the 13 times

that you recommended the product.

This seems systemic.