Conservative Speaker 3
speaker
70 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard May 2025
last heard May 2025
Conservative Speaker 3’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
100%.
Do you want to hear more about why? Sure, yeah, go ahead.
Okay. I understand what you're saying. For the sake of the argument, I would say that I agree to an extent, right? Love that. Obviously, it depends on what we're, what's grooming, right? Well, let's define grooming.
So typically in, I mean, most political circles, right, they would say grooming is any kind of act that kind of leads to like a sexual act. That's sexual grooming.
But I would say that grooming is not intrinsic or exclusive to the political right, right? Grooming is... No, it's not.
Democrats do it.
Republicans do it, right?
Yes. But my point is, is that for the sake of argument, I would say I agree. But I kind of reject the initial premise because... And even this ties into your previous point, because I think what you're actually trying to say is that the agenda that LGBT activists- There is no agenda. Everyone has an agenda. It doesn't matter.
Well, if you're an organized group, you have an agenda.
Okay. Well, for the sake of argument, let's just say every group has some kind of focus and things they're trying to accomplish, right? That's not exclusive to one party. Sure. But the reason I think what you're trying to say is that LGBT groups aren't the issue. Gun violence, stuff like that is the issue.
But the reason why I kind of reject that premise is because when it comes to a lot of these medical conversations we have, there is actually no medical consensus. There is a medical consensus.
How many doctors are in the AMA? If you have doctors who disagree, that by definition means there's no medical consensus. Also, when you have instances like Have you heard about the... There was a $10 million NIH-funded study led by, I believe her name was Dr. Johanna. Yes. And she did a study and found that there were no... Not no, but there weren't as much... mental health benefits.
Okay, sure. But the thing is, when you have conversations, we have doctors in various groups who don't. There is no such thing as consensus when it comes to science.
All it takes is one person in the corner of the world going like, I don't like French fries, and suddenly French fries aren't popular. The issue that conservatives have is the gaslighting. When you say things like, it's not happening, it's not happening, it's not happening, because that is fundamentally not true, and you can't have conversations with people.
Because the issue is that when you have other medical groups, I think you referenced the American Psychological Association.
Yeah, yes. And pediatric. Even they have said that when it comes to gender-affirming care, a lot of kids, when they go through adolescence, when they go through puberty, no longer have that same gender dysphoria. And it goes back to my- Do you know why? But hold on, hold on, hold on. Okay, let's pause. You've been voted out by the majority. I appreciate you.
First off, I would like to say that your question I think is worded very, uh, How do I put it?
Anti. Okay, so could you tell me what it means by against it? Like, could you give me an example of legislation that is anti-Christian that is also anti-LGBTQ?
I do not believe so. But they do. So looking at Christianity, because you're the one who brought it up, in Matthew 18, 6, Christ says, if any of you causes one of these little ones to stumble, it is better that a millstone is tied around your neck and you drown in the depths of the ocean.
Not that they should be, but it's better off that they would be.
Showing 1–20 of 70 · page 1 of 4
Next →