Corey Knowles

Because, you know, consciousness is absolutely something that philosophers have struggled with for eons and eons.

And we're in this unique new situation where suddenly it's a discussion worth having again.

It's very, it's pertinent.

And you raised some really, really good points there, I think, around the idea of that.

One thing that I've wondered is,

the average person, when they interact with a tool like this, they know nothing of the back end.

You know, for them, this is an app that gives all of the vibes of human, or not human, let me rephrase that, of consciousness.

And it feels like this is going to be an increasingly difficult thing to explain to people and illustrate as we go.

And...

Do you feel like this is something we'll handle on or learn more about as we go?

That's a really good call out because, you know, when we think about like how this is working in the U.S.

where we have these various frontier labs, we have some smaller labs as well that are working on projects.

And, you know, you might be able to to regulate this in a specific region in that way.

But I feel like the open source community might be where struggles come from.

As far as this sort of stuff, because and I'm generally very pro open source, but the truth is, I do believe there are some inherent risks with it as well in this way.

Does that concern you at all?

Yeah.

And at some point they'll be in robots where they give the bipedal vibe of a human, which is going to make it even more complex, I think.

Something I wanted to ask about that is on another subject you mentioned yesterday, actually.

You mentioned that evenly distributed but unevenly activated AI.