Curtis Yarvin

I would say that the thing that I admire about Vance and the thing that's really remarkable about him as a leader is that I think that he contains within him all kinds of Americans. You know, his ability to connect with like flyover Americans in the world that he came from is, of course, very, very great.

But the other thing that's neat about him is that he went to Yale and Yale Law School, in fact. And so he can connect at a he speaks. He is a fluent speaker of the language of The New York Times, which you cannot say about Donald Trump.

But the other thing that's neat about him is that he went to Yale and Yale Law School, in fact. And so he can connect at a he speaks. He is a fluent speaker of the language of The New York Times, which you cannot say about Donald Trump.

And basically, one of the things that I believe really strongly, you know, that I haven't touched on when I talk about monarchy is I think that it's utterly essential for anything like an American monarchy is that you have to be the president of all Americans.

And basically, one of the things that I believe really strongly, you know, that I haven't touched on when I talk about monarchy is I think that it's utterly essential for anything like an American monarchy is that you have to be the president of all Americans.

And I think this is something that basically the new administration could do a much better job of reaching out to progressive Americans and not demonizing them and basically saying, hey, you know, you want to make this country a better place? Like, I feel like you've been misinformed in some ways. You're not a bad person. This is like 10 to 20 percent of Americans.

And I think this is something that basically the new administration could do a much better job of reaching out to progressive Americans and not demonizing them and basically saying, hey, you know, you want to make this country a better place? Like, I feel like you've been misinformed in some ways. You're not a bad person. This is like 10 to 20 percent of Americans.

This is a lot of people are like the NPR class. They are not bad people, evil people who want to like. But the thing is, They're human beings. We're all human beings. And like human beings can support bad regimes.

This is a lot of people are like the NPR class. They are not bad people, evil people who want to like. But the thing is, They're human beings. We're all human beings. And like human beings can support bad regimes.

But he's also an intellectual and he contains within him intellectual.

But he's also an intellectual and he contains within him intellectual.

Is your rhetorical tone different in a setting like this? You're looking for different, my thinking is definitely not shifted and you're finding different emphases. Let me, you know, it's like when I talk about rage, for example, you know, both my parents worked for the federal government. They were career, you know, federal employees.

Is your rhetorical tone different in a setting like this? You're looking for different, my thinking is definitely not shifted and you're finding different emphases. Let me, you know, it's like when I talk about rage, for example, you know, both my parents worked for the federal government. They were career, you know, federal employees.

It is, it is. But the thing is, basically, when you look at the way, when you look at those, the way to treat those institutions, I'm just like treat it like a company that goes out of business, but sort of more so because these people having had power have to actually be treated even more delicately and with even more respect. And winning means these are your people now.

It is, it is. But the thing is, basically, when you look at the way, when you look at those, the way to treat those institutions, I'm just like treat it like a company that goes out of business, but sort of more so because these people having had power have to actually be treated even more delicately and with even more respect. And winning means these are your people now.

And so the thing is, when you understand the perspective of the new regime with respect to the American aristocracy, their perspective has can't be this sort of anti aristocratic thing of like, we're going to like bayonet all the professors and like, you know, throw them in ditches or whatever.

And so the thing is, when you understand the perspective of the new regime with respect to the American aristocracy, their perspective has can't be this sort of anti aristocratic thing of like, we're going to like bayonet all the professors and like, you know, throw them in ditches or whatever.

Their perspective has to be that, like, you were a normal person serving a regime that did this, like, really weird and crazy stuff.

Their perspective has to be that, like, you were a normal person serving a regime that did this, like, really weird and crazy stuff.

It depends what you mean by democracy. I mean, I think that the problem is basically when people equate democracy with good government, when you use that word, you're using a very tricky word. I would say that what someone like I'm on very safe ground, despite not knowing him well at all, that someone like J.D. Vance believes essentially in the common good.