Damien Barrett
speaker
11,360 appearances
20 recordings
3 series
first heard May 2026
last heard 5d ago
Damien Barrett’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 20 in all, peaking in Jul 2026 with 6.
Appearances
They've got twelve wins to their name, but matches coming up against teams that they're
Not going to be guaranteed to win and if Sin Kilda in Melbourne.
See that?
Yeah, and if St Kilda is to win out, it just might throw that position uh even in a wild card sense uh into jeopardy for the dogs.
Look after watching last night, they probably don't deserve to be in there.
They've won enough games, their percentage is pretty poor, but defensively again last night let them down.
Paul Curtis just running through an easy stoppage to kick a goal, uh fumbling, drop marks, I just thought they were so
Far off it last night.
And North Melbourne, to their credit, they came, they were hungry, they hunted, they almost coughed it up multiple times, but um well done.
And the biggest story, how is the one that was broken by Jay Clark in the the Herald Sun uh on Thursday morning and Wednesday night, Thursday morning, and that involving the the waiver slash disclaimer contract deal that was signed by a Geelong player with his club separate to the standard contract that has to be lodged with the AFL and uh approved by the AFL PA effectively.
So
There's been clearance from the AFL from a sanctioned perspective on the Geelong Footy Club, but there are are still a lot of questions that I think need to be properly asked and uh most importantly answered, Chief, because uh I think it the uh the way it was wrapped up yesterday with the statements made by the AFL, the AFL PA and the Geelong Footy Club, I just feel there was a a fair bit left um unsaid and and unexplained in in what's a very, very serious issue as the game
Game is now bracing itself for the wave of litigation that is coming in relation to uh head knocks.
Yeah, far too many questions left unanswered.
We want to know whose idea it was to start with, who knew about it, why it needed to be done if he'd been cleared to return to play.
No, we just stood up again.
It's quite but it's quite bizarre, but we want to know everybody that knew about it and ticked off on it and and why they felt the need to do it.
And uh look, everyone takes a a different part of the story, I think, uh, with them and and maybe focuses on a different part of it.
But the bit I sort of took most out of the Geelong statement, and this was uh an official wording of it, the club was not attempting to vary the terms of the AFL standard playing contract or attempting to avoid its responsibilities under health.
and safety laws.
Showing 3461–3480 of 11,360 · page 174 of 568
← Previous
Next →