Dane Wigington

divert the course of a 100,000 ton freight train by pulling a lever, literally, and changing the tracks.

And that's kind of small input, massive output that you can have with these cyclonic rotations when they have the ability to manipulate atmospheric pressure zones.

This is undisputed, patented science.

So why would we think they're not using these type of operations?

We have historical precedent.

Project Popeye in Vietnam was so successful at controlling precipitation.

This is a historical record that by 1976, they passed the Inmot Treaties, forbidding weather manipulation for wartime purposes, but not over a country's own population.

So if we look at the

Very easily researched historical record.

U.S.

military was so successful at controlling precipitation over Vietnam that the international community was very concerned about this, at least on the surface.

And they passed environmental modification treaties in 1976, international treaties forbidding weather manipulation in wartime.

So again, when people claim this is conspiracy, we don't have this kind of power and control, and they try to muddy the climate engineering issue as being

The localized, publicized cloud seeding operations, those are two completely different animals.

And we see even some state legislators doing the same there.

And we're trying to correct that at Geoengineering Marshall because we're working with numerous state legislators now and have been.

There's legislation pending in 36 states to ban geoengineering over their skies.

Tennessee and Florida have already done so.

But we're...

correcting them and giving them an accurate compass heading that the localized, publicized cloud seeding operations, the kind which they tried to implicate in the Texas floods that killed so many young Americans, as being connected to a localized cloud seeding operation, which is virtually meaningless in comparison to climate engineering.