Daniel Sedin or Henrik Sedin

It's always going to be the ownership involvement.

Yeah.

The plan, I'm sure, is for the Sedins to be a buffer, but we'll see.

We don't know if it's going to work.

And it's not ownership involvement.

a long and well-documented history of catastrophic leadership from the ownership suite that has prevented this team from achieving results, even in line with just like even, even in line with like mediocrity adjusted for being in a high revenue market, right?

Like the Canucks have been by far the worst team that earns and has the level of attention that,

That the Canucks do.

Yes.

You know, like, because on some level you understand, like, Buffalo didn't spend anything, so of course they sucked.

Like, the Arizona Cavaliers were a joke.

Arizona was a joke, yeah.

The Seattle Kraken absolutely failed to understand the assignment of the expansion process, but also are an expansion team, right?

Like, what's the Canucks' excuse?

There's no other team.

I guess Chicago would be the only other one, but they won three cups and rebuilt.

Yeah, they won three cups and then tore it down.

Like, it's not really a comparison.

And also...

Chicago's terrible and deserve more heat for screwing up the Bedard era.