Dara Lind

whether what we're seeing is an increase in the number of people who are really, really activated against unauthorized immigration or against immigration generally, or whether what we're seeing is the culmination of the fact that this is the signature policy issue of the man who's been the standard bearer of the Republican Party for a decade.

whether what we're seeing is an increase in the number of people who are really, really activated against unauthorized immigration or against immigration generally, or whether what we're seeing is the culmination of the fact that this is the signature policy issue of the man who's been the standard bearer of the Republican Party for a decade.

And so anyone who's affiliated with the Republican Party has decided that this is a more important issue to them. But I think the other side of this is a lot of people who were in solidly blue jurisdictions saw strains on state and local governments responding to recent arrivals.

And so anyone who's affiliated with the Republican Party has decided that this is a more important issue to them. But I think the other side of this is a lot of people who were in solidly blue jurisdictions saw strains on state and local governments responding to recent arrivals.

And so we're forced, or, you know, I think, I think we're like put in a space where they were considering that actually there was a certain amount of zero sum trade-off between investing in people who are already here and investing in new arrivals and the Biden administration by kind of not being

And so we're forced, or, you know, I think, I think we're like put in a space where they were considering that actually there was a certain amount of zero sum trade-off between investing in people who are already here and investing in new arrivals and the Biden administration by kind of not being

doing a whole lot to ensure that new arrivals were coming in an undisruptive way didn't necessarily help with this. But whether that was something that's going to really change a whole lot of people's opinions permanently or whether it was a reaction to a moment under an administration that is no longer in office is something that remains to be seen.

doing a whole lot to ensure that new arrivals were coming in an undisruptive way didn't necessarily help with this. But whether that was something that's going to really change a whole lot of people's opinions permanently or whether it was a reaction to a moment under an administration that is no longer in office is something that remains to be seen.

I am entirely on board with this, if and only if we can at least start talking to a venue in Stockholm. Because if I have to talk about Swedish administrative data one more time without being in Sweden to do it, it's going to be very upsetting.

I am entirely on board with this, if and only if we can at least start talking to a venue in Stockholm. Because if I have to talk about Swedish administrative data one more time without being in Sweden to do it, it's going to be very upsetting.

Thank you. Yeah.

Thank you. Yeah.

What we see here is a body of orders that are pushing the federal government to take a much, much, much, much, much more aggressive approach on immigration enforcement, especially in the interior of the United States, especially integrating the military into border enforcement in a way we haven't seen. But...

What we see here is a body of orders that are pushing the federal government to take a much, much, much, much, much more aggressive approach on immigration enforcement, especially in the interior of the United States, especially integrating the military into border enforcement in a way we haven't seen. But...

without really prescribing a whole lot in terms of specifics because they understand that that's going to have to happen at the agency level. That's going to have to – you know, that requires the actual machinery of the federal government to work itself out to figure out what that looks like on the ground. And so a lot of Biden-era enforcement priorities got rescinded.

without really prescribing a whole lot in terms of specifics because they understand that that's going to have to happen at the agency level. That's going to have to – you know, that requires the actual machinery of the federal government to work itself out to figure out what that looks like on the ground. And so a lot of Biden-era enforcement priorities got rescinded.

It is currently – and this is actually as of Tuesday night – The U.S. has the legal authority to deport people without a court hearing if they're arrested anywhere in the U.S. and cannot prove to an ICE agent's satisfaction that they've been in the U.S. for at least two years, which is something we're going to have to see how that plays out on the ground. And there is...

It is currently – and this is actually as of Tuesday night – The U.S. has the legal authority to deport people without a court hearing if they're arrested anywhere in the U.S. and cannot prove to an ICE agent's satisfaction that they've been in the U.S. for at least two years, which is something we're going to have to see how that plays out on the ground. And there is...

A push toward building more capacity for detention, which is going to be very important if they're going to scale up enforcement efforts. A push toward punishing other countries that refuse to accept deportation flights by putting visa sanctions on them, which is going to be extremely important if you're going to succeed in deporting people.

A push toward building more capacity for detention, which is going to be very important if they're going to scale up enforcement efforts. A push toward punishing other countries that refuse to accept deportation flights by putting visa sanctions on them, which is going to be extremely important if you're going to succeed in deporting people.