Dave Aronberg

And Mel Gibson, who shot the diplomatic community, was actually lethal weapon two. And it was Danny Glover who then said immunity revoked. So facts first. Appreciate that.

And Mel Gibson, who shot the diplomatic community, was actually lethal weapon two. And it was Danny Glover who then said immunity revoked. So facts first. Appreciate that.

Yes, we are. So here's the thing, Mike, and everything that's said so far is right. President Trump's right that this debate stretches from the time of slavery and the 14th Amendment passed because they wanted to make sure the children of slaves are citizens because they're born here, they're citizens. And then later on in the 19th century, we have the question, does it include the Chinese people?

Yes, we are. So here's the thing, Mike, and everything that's said so far is right. President Trump's right that this debate stretches from the time of slavery and the 14th Amendment passed because they wanted to make sure the children of slaves are citizens because they're born here, they're citizens. And then later on in the 19th century, we have the question, does it include the Chinese people?

Yes, we are. So here's the thing, Mike, and everything that's said so far is right. President Trump's right that this debate stretches from the time of slavery and the 14th Amendment passed because they wanted to make sure the children of slaves are citizens because they're born here, they're citizens. And then later on in the 19th century, we have the question, does it include the Chinese people?

And that's when the Supreme Court ruled in 1898, which is after the ruling you cite in that case, Wong Kim Ark, that yes, Chinese too, if you're born here, you are a citizen here.

And that's when the Supreme Court ruled in 1898, which is after the ruling you cite in that case, Wong Kim Ark, that yes, Chinese too, if you're born here, you are a citizen here.

And that's when the Supreme Court ruled in 1898, which is after the ruling you cite in that case, Wong Kim Ark, that yes, Chinese too, if you're born here, you are a citizen here.

And I'm just coming at this from a legal matter where you have that Reagan appointed judge saying that if you make this argument in court, you perhaps should have your bar license revoked because the constitution says what it says. And therefore you'd have to get the Supreme Court to either overturn

And I'm just coming at this from a legal matter where you have that Reagan appointed judge saying that if you make this argument in court, you perhaps should have your bar license revoked because the constitution says what it says. And therefore you'd have to get the Supreme Court to either overturn

And I'm just coming at this from a legal matter where you have that Reagan appointed judge saying that if you make this argument in court, you perhaps should have your bar license revoked because the constitution says what it says. And therefore you'd have to get the Supreme Court to either overturn

hundreds of years of precedent, or you gotta have a new constitutional amendment that undoes the 14th amendment.

hundreds of years of precedent, or you gotta have a new constitutional amendment that undoes the 14th amendment.

hundreds of years of precedent, or you gotta have a new constitutional amendment that undoes the 14th amendment.

This is the case. But other federal courts have. I mean, the other federal courts have ruled consistently with that case. And until that case is overturned, then that's the law. That's the rule. But the Supreme Court. That's correct. That's correct. But that case has, through other federal courts, appellate courts, has been reaffirmed that way.

This is the case. But other federal courts have. I mean, the other federal courts have ruled consistently with that case. And until that case is overturned, then that's the law. That's the rule. But the Supreme Court. That's correct. That's correct. But that case has, through other federal courts, appellate courts, has been reaffirmed that way.

This is the case. But other federal courts have. I mean, the other federal courts have ruled consistently with that case. And until that case is overturned, then that's the law. That's the rule. But the Supreme Court. That's correct. That's correct. But that case has, through other federal courts, appellate courts, has been reaffirmed that way.

They have recognized that there's not a conflict among the circuit. There's no current conflict amongst federal courts that say- Right, but there's about to be.

They have recognized that there's not a conflict among the circuit. There's no current conflict amongst federal courts that say- Right, but there's about to be.

They have recognized that there's not a conflict among the circuit. There's no current conflict amongst federal courts that say- Right, but there's about to be.