Dave Lawler

Would this be, you know, maybe they have intelligence of where uranium was moved after the strikes?

Would they go in for nuclear related targets?

Or as sources have suggested to us, would this be a broader operation?

operation targeting military targets, potentially political targets.

Again, folks, senior folks in the regime, you'll remember the Israelis last time took out a bunch of generals and nuclear scientists, et cetera.

I have a feeling that there are folks in Israel who are constantly updating the target list on Iranian folks if this scenario takes place.

You know, a good question on the nuclear issue and one to watch for sure whether Trump will limit, if this happens, the U.S.

objectives as he did last time to things related to Iran's nuclear program.

You know, they went in, they hit three nuclear facilities, and then Trump declared a truce, basically said, we're going to stop here if you stop here.

And it wound down pretty quickly.

Yeah.

They agreed to meet afterwards.

But in other ways, it was very clear that the president has set some red lines that the Iranians are not yet willing to actually acknowledge and work through.

So we're going to keep on working it.

But of course, the president reserves the ability to say when he thinks that diplomacy has reached its natural end.

We hope we don't get to that point.

But if we do, that'll be the president's call.

I think it is precisely the case that the folks who are talking about this the most are the hawks on the right who want this to happen more.

Lindsey Graham has been talking about the strikes in Iran every day for weeks now.

Have you heard very many Democratic senators come out on the other side and make a case against striking Iran?