David French

Like, just to lay the cards on the table, I think that any post-Trump politics that's going to put us in a place that doesn't just lead us back to where we are is going to have to rest on aggressive accountability for wrongdoing and lawbreaking of a kind that I think Americans are actually kind of uncomfortable with, right?

You know, if we, you know,

investigations of the executive branch, of what Stephen Miller's been up to, what has Roosevelt been up to during these years.

A willingness to say...

People who broke the law need to be held criminally accountable.

People who were engaged in this massive corruption flowing from the White House, we need to freeze those assets.

We need to refer them for criminal prosecution.

And so that's going to read as very aggressive.

It's going to read as very partisan.

It's going to read as very divisive.

But I think it's necessary or you just come right back to where we are.

And my question, David, is like, how do you perceive that?

Like, I don't perceive that as tit for tat trying to humiliate my opponents.

I perceive that as trying to clean house.

But I'm curious to know what you think.

I just I just like imagining like a calendar where it's like B.E.

and A.E.

Oh, gosh.

Yeah.

I'll believe it when I see it, you know, like, okay, okay, Representative Massey, sure.