David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)
speaker
368 appearances
22 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard May 2025
David Patrick Caracos (Promo Speaker)’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
you know, the sexist manner. I don't know if I buy that, but I do agree with Diddy's attorneys. They should be turned over. If that is going to be evidence that is used, you have an obligation to turn it over. Now, reading the report, I saw that Diddy's attorneys were allowed to view the videos, but they were only allowed to view them in private with law enforcement overseeing everything.
You can't do that. And Diddy needs to be have an opportunity to also go over because look, defendants, they have to be able to prepare for their own trial, whether they're, you know, innocent, guilty, doesn't matter. You're always innocent until proven guilty in this country. Last time I checked. So he has to be able to prepare. He's got obviously nothing to do during the day. He's in jail all day.
So he's going to have all the time in the world to prepare. He's got to see what's on these videos. But the other thing that I find very interesting is Diddy doesn't have these videos. Diddy never had these videos. They are in the possession of Cassie. That does undermine her credibility a little bit. It undermines that she is an alleged victim.
They're saying that she enjoyed the videos, that when you see them, that she enjoyed it. I don't know what's on them or not, but... If she had the videos herself and not Diddy, that would definitely bring a red flag to the government. And that would definitely help me if I'm Diddy's attorney, because I'm going to just go at her on the stand saying, why did you have these videos?
If you were horrified, if you were sexually assaulted, if there's images that were just gruesome and you'd never consented, why do you have these videos? And not just one, not just two, not just three, but nine of them. So there's a lot of questions that I that I would have. So they I if I'm these attorneys, I'm jumping up and down to have these videos.
I'm sure they're probably, you know, not very flattering, if you will, and probably maybe embarrassing because who wants to have a sex tape out there? But look, this is a public trial. You have to have it.
Well, let's just go back for a second, though. They want them to be turned over. That doesn't necessarily mean that they're going to be produced at the trial and that they're going to be used as evidence. Diddy's team just wants to see them. They want to see maybe they are going to use them. Maybe they aren't. Who knows?
But if it's evidence that the government has, they are entitled to it and they have to be able to have it. So I'm not saying it's going to be in the trial. It may not be. But they're saying that they've already seen it, most of it sounds like. So they obviously think that there's something there.
I can't imagine that you're going to, that they want to introduce it if you have open drugs and alcohol and everything like that out, you know, in the open, in the videos. So I'd be very interested if I was Diddy's and his attorney to see everything, what they have, and then maybe you'll use it, maybe you won't.
Yes. Yeah, they're going to have to. They're going to object to it, obviously, and the judge is going to have to rule whether they can be released to Diddy's attorneys. It's going to be interesting to see how the judge rules. I think he's probably going to rule—
in favor of diddy some way but i don't think it's going to be the whole kit and caboodle because look diddy uh he has not been the model citizen in in the jail so far uh he there's allegations that he's contacted witnesses and tampered with the witnesses and other individuals that are associated with him as well also that
In the jail, he's also been using individuals' social media and phones to contact individuals. So I don't know if the judge is going to give it all over immediately to Diddy because he could then potentially...
have other individuals look at it maybe i i don't know i would think there's going to be some type of protection on there that maybe diddy can only see it with his attorneys that the attorneys can't give him a copy of it you know i i don't think that the judge is going to just point blank give everything to diddy and his attorney i think there's going to be some type of protection
I think it's very fair. And again, Diddy has to prepare for trial. So the only way to prepare is to see all the evidence. And when you're only allowed to look at it for X amount of time and when you have guards and security looking over your shoulder... It's very difficult to do that, and there's no attorney-client privilege that way either.
Probably. I wouldn't be surprised if there is. The other thing is there could be a consent order from Diddy's attorneys and the government where they enter into some type of an agreement where the attorneys for Diddy will only have access to it. to the Tates and that Diddy can only view them while in the presence of the attorneys.
So I think that could also be something that would maybe streamline everything. But, you know, this has been a pretty difficult case for everybody involved and everybody is fighting for every little inch. So I wouldn't be surprised if there's going to be some type of a hearing. All right.
Well, I don't know what's on there, Kayla. So that's the thing. If there is damaging evidence for Cassie on there, and I'm just speculating, but let's just say that she's participating in things and looks like she's having a really good time. that obviously won't look good for her and her claims of what Diddy did. It'll undermine her credibility, like I said just previously.
So I think the government would try not to allow that to be in. But it's called Brady evidence, meaning you have to turn over Everything that you have, whether you're going to use it or not, whether it's beneficial or not beneficial to the government, you have to turn it over. So I think that they're going to have to do it one way or another.
I'm sure they're probably scratching at the wall, trying not to turn this particular evidence over. But in the end, the judge is probably going to make them.
Both are realistic, honestly. Now, remember, you're going to have separate jurisdictions. So if there are claims where he sexually assaulted individuals in, let's say, L.A., well, his trial right now is in New York. So there would have to be separate claims there, separate complaints. But a lot of them are originating out of New York. So, yeah, they could be potentially modified and added into it.
Showing 241–260 of 368 · page 13 of 19
← Previous
Next →