David Sampson

Yeah, what you say is that given the information we had at the time, we always tell you that things can change.

Like the way he's talked about the Clippers and Aspiration.

He'll give you a thought with today, but with Pablo dripping and drabbing out more information, he has the right to change his mind.

And that's what he's going to say about Rozier.

Hey, given where we were then,

This is what our decision was, and we were right.

Since then, it's come to our attention that the following happened.

Had we known then what we know now, clearly he would not have been cleared.

First of all, he has a hamstring injury.

He was not let off the bench in handcuffs.

I assume they went to the team hotel.

Two, you can absolutely have new facts that come up when you're making decisions, running your company, which you're not doing anymore.

But if you were, do you not agree that certain things change that leads you to make different decisions today that you would have made yesterday?

Yeah.

Oh, I think that's exactly the level that it always rises to because the federal ability to investigate.

Remember the NBA, no subpoena powers.

You don't have to talk to the NBA investigators or MLB Department of Investigations when the federal government asks you a question.

You have to answer.

Now you can invoke the Fifth Amendment, be my guest, enjoy, but they have the right to compel you to testify.

There are grand juries who are seated to look at evidence in a way that the leagues don't do with their department investigations.