David Spark

It's reasonable.

These folks are doing... Well, it's all over the map.

There are holes in this thing like Swiss cheese.

But the other one doesn't even have the cheese.

It's nothing but the hole.

In the first one, I don't actually have a security program at all.

Like, there's something written down.

That's not a security program.

That's a vaporware.

I would much rather have the second where I've got people actually out helping make things marginally better.

Yes, I know my successor is going to have an awful future, but that is not part of the scenario is what my successor gets.

It's only what I'm stuck with.

So I would rather have the second.

First one is worse.

We're not doing anything from a security perspective.

All right.

I throw this to you, Amit.

Agree or disagree?

yeah i've got to say i'm really happy that near tossed that rule at us because he threw it at me because i used to modify the scenarios and be like well because in the old world i'd have been like well i would take the first one because i can make it better and so he you know gave us the rule if you can't make these better you're stuck with them you can't you're stuck with these yes none of these would be bad if you could change scenarios right

Yeah.