Donald Hoffman

I mean, you'd think that everybody likes consciousness and mathematics and is a geek, and they're not.

So you'd get the wrong picture about what really is the Twitterverse.

And so I would think that all the headsets are just projections, like taking the Twitterverse onto one person's Twitter account.

They're projections onto a consistent, as you point out, the

To keep persistence, you might want to have a whole group of them that see the same thing and can both agree that – all agree that there's a red Porsche or something like that in the game.

So you could have a bunch of them that have similar projections of the one.

bigger conscious dynamics.

Or maybe I should just stop there and see if that's addressed to your question or.

So great question on the free will and then the nature of the origin of this headset.

And is it just all pre-programmed or is there room for exploration?

Is that assertion correct?

I'm not sure.

These are deep waters now.

So that's why I'm myself now having some difficult trouble.

So I would say the free will question first.

When I look at our mathematics, I could interpret the Markovian kernel for a given agent as representing the free will choice of that agent.

I could interpret it that way.

But if I do that, I look at all the others and it's being affected by all the other conscious agents.

So my probability space is being impacted by the other conscious agents.

That's right.