Dr. Clare Craig
speaker
83 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Nov 2024
Dr. Clare Craig’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
That's like, you know, part of the sequence of what a virus could do. What these replicating ones, one of the differences is, as you pointed out, their capsule is lipid rather than protein. What that means is they haven't got anything on the surface that allows antibodies to bind to say this is something foreign that we need to get rid of.
So they're actually like kind of stealth viral type things because they've got nothing. The immune system can't attack them until they've already done something in a cell. So that in some ways they're even worse than a virus would be. But yeah, the ethics of it is something that has just been sidelined and it's been done very intentionally.
And there are lots and lots of strict and difficult experiments that have to be done in order to do anything to do with genetic therapies. And those were all bypassed on the basis that we were in an emergency and then we were going to call these vaccines. And it's as if the word vaccine has this kind of, you know, all powerful sanctification of a drug when the drug is still a gene therapy.
And it should have had to go through all of the hoops that gene therapy drugs go through. And now that they've done that. they seem to think, well, we can carry on down this path and we don't have to, first of all, go back and do the work on the products that billions of people have had, which have not been done. And second of all, just carry on with these crazy experiments.
So there's sort of fundamental points around checking whether or not a product like that will enter the DNA, what kind of rate at which it will sort of get into the human DNA. And, you know, the sort of thing I was referring to before around how long it lasts and what happens to the nucleotides after the product's broken down.
what it does for fertility and the germline, you know, all of that wasn't done. It wasn't done. And they just said, oh, we didn't do this. And they were quite open about it because they didn't need to lie because the regulators weren't making them do it. And the regulators still haven't made them do it. That's the real scandal. It's not even been done in retrospect.
And I was looking today at something Pfizer said at the time, back in 2021 on their website, when they were talking about how they had a whole team of people who did gene therapy and And they got that team and they just pulled them into the COVID vaccine and worked because they had all the experience of their mRNA technology and their lipid nanoparticles because that is what gene therapy is.
They were the experts in it.
Yeah. And, you know, of course, the story that I was referring to earlier that's been shared a lot is around the DNA that was in these products, which were contaminant DNA. And that DNA included... regions of sequence that tells the surrounding cell machinery to replicate it and make a particular protein.
And if that kind of sequence ends up in your DNA near a whole load of different genes, which are growth genes or replication genes or anything like that, that is a That is a cancer risk. And that sequence should never have been there at all. The DNA should never have been contaminating these vials. The regulator wasn't told about this sequence.
And the sequence would have been through a software that would have labeled up what was identifiable and recognizable within it. And that software would have identified these sequences. But what was submitted to the regulator had had that information edited out. So that's not sort of accident or an oversight.
Somebody has actually said, well, we're not going to tell them that that's in there because it's a bit of sequence that human cells will respond to and that it's not good for humans to have. That's essentially what was going on there. And I think there's something about the DNA, which is a beautiful thing.
And, you know, our DNA does have within it, human DNA, bits of viruses from over the ages that have sort of, you know, changed what we are and who we are. But the idea that humans are now interfering with what is a sort of divine code, if you like, there are reasons that we have very, very strict rules on this because
you can't undo messing around with your DNA and you certainly can't undo messing around with DNA that might end up in the, you know, eggs and sperm and end up in the next generation.
I love it. I don't think that Jess is wrong. And, you know, the point you're saying there about it, that this is DNA that's actually in a lipid nanoparticle, which would deliver it into the cell with a nuclear localization signal, which drags it into the nucleus. You know, there's all sorts of aspects of it, which are
really not great and as she said they're not very good at getting rid of it yet my worry is if this becomes a story the fact that all of these cardiac deaths have happened will just be forgotten about and you know that both things need to be talked about they're both there's a sort of the thing that has happened that has killed people and there's the sort of ongoing risk together
And so I don't think one story should be dominating over the other. And the cardiac story, I don't feel, I guess neither of them have completely hit home, have they? But I'm just hoping that cardiac story doesn't get buried. I have good news on the subject.
No, no, I agree with her. I think that it was manmade. I think there's plenty of evidence that it was manmade and there's, there's, you know, I, I, There's stuff in that spike that's really nasty. And so, you know, the idea that it would be trying to mimic a human, yeah, sure.
I am still here. And I just I can't help thinking it's something around scientists seeing that the sort of DNA world is a final frontier and that there's some sort of, you know, we have to do this because this is progress. And I think they've managed to convince a lot of powerful politicians around them that this is progress.
And the reality is that a lot of what they are claiming that these products can do is based around mythology in the first place. So, you know, when Jess is saying, well, people don't need these injections, they never needed these injections. You know, they were never, ever needed. And a lot of the sort of stories told about viruses and about pandemics are mythological. They're not based in fact.
Showing 61–80 of 83 · page 4 of 5
← Previous
Next →