Dr. Meryl Nass
speaker
37 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Nov 2024
Dr. Meryl Nass’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
Now, if I could figure that out in five minutes, why couldn't the Lancet editors, you know, why couldn't the peer reviewers, you know, no one had ever heard of such a database before. And it turned out it was a company with five employees. So. You know, it was ridiculous.
Right. And The Lancet has had a series of articles that are questionable. They eventually did admit that this one was fabricated. The editor-in-chief, Richard Wharton, admitted that. But the journals have refused to publish other good papers or retracted papers that got published when they were politically incorrect.
And the specialty boards, as you know, went after and took away the board certification of Dr. Merrick and Dr. Corey. And when I looked up the board, I looked myself up when that happened to them and found that mine had been removed. I no longer had a board. And they hadn't even contacted me.
It is interesting. Well, you know, when you look into the board, you see the fellow who was the head has just recently retired a few months ago. What was his name? Richard Barron. And he was also the head of the foundation for the American Board of Internal Medicine. And he was earning over a million dollars a year with that gig. Right.
He had published a paper and talked on a New England Journal podcast about how difficult, you know, they asked him, well, how do you figure out what's misinformation and what isn't misinformation? And he dodged. He said, well, if a doctor tells somebody to go get treated with magnets for cancer, well, that's misinformation. But he wouldn't draw a line or give a definition. No.
Which is what every, in my case, when I took, you know, when I went before the medical board in Maine, they would not say what I had either, what specific thing I said that was misinformation, nor would they define what misinformation was. So the board, the board of internal medicine knew they were skating on thin ice, but decided to...
You know, cross a line and take away people's board certifications, you know, on the basis of this misinformation thing, which they didn't define. And I would say that they were just like the case of Brianne. They breached a contract. We had an implied contract with them, right? We did our residency. We took our test. We paid our dues. And that was the deal.
They give us the board certification when we've gone through those hoops. And just to take it away like that, it's not written down anywhere how they can do that. You know, I mean, they're allowed to do it if you've done something terrible. But if they don't even specify what it is you've done, they can't do it. But they did it anyway.
So we've, you know, anyway, so there's a lot of illegal things that have gone on. And it seems that there was some kind of collusion because several boards were doing the same thing. The pediatrics board and the OBGYN board was doing the same thing. And many of the journals were doing the same thing. And somebody must have told them to do it, and presumably money changed hands.
Something changed hands. So I think a RICO case is very reasonable, and it's a way to get to the bottom of what exactly happened.
I was going to answer a question you had posed earlier, which is that the AstraZeneca vaccine and the Johnson & Johnson vaccines were both using the adenovirus as a vector, were both double-stranded DNA, but they were made by two different companies.
Moderna versus Pfizer. Now, most of the doses for both of them, so AstraZeneca was never given an EUA or a license in the United States. Right.
The company that used to make, and still does, make anthrax vaccine, a very crooked company, had contracts to make AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines. And they mixed them up. They contaminated their ingredients, and they had to throw away the ingredients for about 400 million doses of those vaccines.
And the contract was taken away, so they couldn't make them anymore. But there was only a relatively small number of the J&J that were used in the United States.
When I took that vaccine, before I had COVID. Before anyone had announced that cavernous sinus thrombosis was a side effect?
So there we are. So vaccinators were instructed not to withdraw the syringe to see whether they were in a blood vessel or not.
Hey, thank you. Bye-bye now. God bless.
Showing 21–37 of 37 · page 2 of 2
← Previous