Dr. Ram Yogendra
speaker
332 appearances
3 recordings
1 series
first heard May 2025
last heard 13 Aug
Dr. Ram Yogendra’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 2 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 2.
Appearances
And obviously, you know, the history is very important. When you have a patient say, look, I got I have no medical problems. I went and got the vaccine. And 24 hours later, I'm in the emergency room or, you know, I can't get out of bed or having myocarditis and my my chest is about to explode. You know, there is there is definitely something there that needs to be needs to be considered.
Yeah. So everyone knows if you if you find some data, they all say, well, get it in the journals, get it in a in a well-respected, high impact factor medical journal. So he said, OK, you know, we're not going to post stuff on Twitter or, you know, Reddit or wherever people are posting these days. Let's go go through the scientific process and the methodology.
so in 2021 we by the end of the end of 2021 we had actually found an immune signature in post-covid vaccine syndrome we also found the spike protein from the vaccine in the monocytes in the vascular monocytes of these patients we knew it was the spike protein because we sequenced them so it wasn't just using flow cytometry but we sequenced them and all of this information
was on our paper and it's been in the preprint service since 2021 so none of this is new when people say the Yale study was was new it's like no we knew this in 2021 internally in our group we had doctors in our team who told me Rob don't we should not be studying this we should not be looking at this in our own group my God do not put my name on this paper
And, you know, we have an ethical and moral duty. I'm not making this up. This is not data or something I'm making up. It's just we find something we have to present it to not only the scientific community, but the public, and then let the decision makers decide what they're going to do with that information.
And so that's when we delayed the paper, you know, even submitting it till about the middle of 2020 to the journal. We wanted to get the FDA, the NIH and the CDC engaged.
now in 2021 april of 2021 we were introduced by congressman mike doyle of pittsburgh to francis collins at the nih and there's this is a public meeting it's on april 29th of 2021 when he was first introduced to all of our research and we sent all of this to dr collins And Congressman Doyle specifically told Dr. Collins to any correspondence with us that he wanted to be CC'd on this.
Well, crickets. We sent all our papers to Dr. Collins. We were on a call with them and he said, oh, this is very interesting. We sent our all our data to the FDA, to Dr. Woodcock, to Dr. Marks, all of our data, what we found. And we were not trying to cause controversy or we say, hey, look, we found something.
We're finding the spike protein in potentially these in these vaccines weeks and months after after vaccination.
Sure. So we submitted it to six different journals and going through the peer review process. And the first journal said, this is a low priority paper, low priority topic. And that's on my Twitter feed. I posted all of the receipts on there. So anyone that wants to take a look and go see it. One of the other journals said, this is preliminary information.
Finally, one journal said, we will accept for peer review. They came back to me and they said, well, this is all copied from another paper. And I said, well, this is from our paper where we found the spike protein in the long COVID patients. It's the same materials and methods section. And the same journal that had published it, now when it came to the vaccine,
they had questions about the materials and methods section. They said, well, you know.
Yeah, you know what happens? When you submit a journal, it goes through this plagiarism check, right? So it'll say, oh, 70% of your paper or 80% is plagiarized. Well, we got this thing back saying, well, this entire section is plagiarized. Well, that's because we applied the same exact materials and methods from the long COVID paper. We're the same group that was published the paper.
So it actually got four out of five stars.
Yeah, you know, I think obviously there's a lot of focus right now on Dr. Fauci and his role in COVID and the response to COVID and, you know, with all the stuff going on in Wuhan and the gain-of-function research and all that going on. But I think the role of Dr. Collins here should also be scrutinized. And that's coming from a personal experience because, you know, our work was ignored.
And I don't know the reason why. Maybe he was busy or maybe someone can ask him. But, you know, this is this is not this is public information. This was on a congressional hearing. And I posted this on my Twitter page where Congressman Doyle is literally bringing us up in our research. And we had some correspondence with him.
And then afterwards, we were ghosted, ghosted by the letter organizations by.
The FDA, NIH, and we didn't engage with the CDC, but it was the NIH and the FDA because we said, look, we found this. I had Brian, he's our lab tech. I said, listen, store the blood because if the FDA scientists or the NIH scientists want to examine these patients' blood, we'll coordinate that and get this over to them. And maybe they can do further studies because
You know, quite frankly, even with our research and what we found, there's still a lot of unanswered questions in our findings. So if we had the help back in 2021, I think we might have helped millions of people that have been suffering from these COVID vaccines. It's true.
Yeah, so we're trying to get the paper published. Um, now they're hit pieces coming against, uh, Bruce and I, um, we're getting doxed, uh, death threats. Uh, you know, we got, I got a call.
Showing 261–280 of 332 · page 14 of 17
← Previous
Next →