Dr. Rick Hanson

in any systematic way, the agency of the individual in how they are engaging their experiences at the time. I've been talking about how do we engage the experiences we're having at the time in ways that promote positive neuroplastic change. What do we do on the inside out with the experience we're already having?

in any systematic way, the agency of the individual in how they are engaging their experiences at the time. I've been talking about how do we engage the experiences we're having at the time in ways that promote positive neuroplastic change. What do we do on the inside out with the experience we're already having?

in any systematic way, the agency of the individual in how they are engaging their experiences at the time. I've been talking about how do we engage the experiences we're having at the time in ways that promote positive neuroplastic change. What do we do on the inside out with the experience we're already having?

Because we have tremendous influence at the front end of the learning process, the formation of memory in the broadest sense, emotional, somatic memory included. The most important factors in terms of what actually lands is what we do at the front end of the experience we're having at the time. When you say front end, what do you mean?

Because we have tremendous influence at the front end of the learning process, the formation of memory in the broadest sense, emotional, somatic memory included. The most important factors in terms of what actually lands is what we do at the front end of the experience we're having at the time. When you say front end, what do you mean?

Because we have tremendous influence at the front end of the learning process, the formation of memory in the broadest sense, emotional, somatic memory included. The most important factors in terms of what actually lands is what we do at the front end of the experience we're having at the time. When you say front end, what do you mean?

Oh, I mean, while you're experiencing something beneficial, while you're experiencing it, whatever you do in your mind or whatever's being made to happen in your mind by a skillful teacher or therapist or coach, that's going to most affect the impact of that experience, whether it sinks in or not. The dirty secret is that

Oh, I mean, while you're experiencing something beneficial, while you're experiencing it, whatever you do in your mind or whatever's being made to happen in your mind by a skillful teacher or therapist or coach, that's going to most affect the impact of that experience, whether it sinks in or not. The dirty secret is that

Oh, I mean, while you're experiencing something beneficial, while you're experiencing it, whatever you do in your mind or whatever's being made to happen in your mind by a skillful teacher or therapist or coach, that's going to most affect the impact of that experience, whether it sinks in or not. The dirty secret is that

The delta, the rate of change from session to session in therapy or counseling or rate of change, listen to a podcast. I do a podcast too. It's really humbling. I write books. I teach meditation. What change is actually happening? It's humbling to stare hard at that.

The delta, the rate of change from session to session in therapy or counseling or rate of change, listen to a podcast. I do a podcast too. It's really humbling. I write books. I teach meditation. What change is actually happening? It's humbling to stare hard at that.

The delta, the rate of change from session to session in therapy or counseling or rate of change, listen to a podcast. I do a podcast too. It's really humbling. I write books. I teach meditation. What change is actually happening? It's humbling to stare hard at that.

And point being, the most powerful factors in change are what people are doing inside their minds at the time with how they engage the experiences they're having. And yet, my whole profession, clinical psychology, broadened out to counseling and coaching, has...

And point being, the most powerful factors in change are what people are doing inside their minds at the time with how they engage the experiences they're having. And yet, my whole profession, clinical psychology, broadened out to counseling and coaching, has...

And point being, the most powerful factors in change are what people are doing inside their minds at the time with how they engage the experiences they're having. And yet, my whole profession, clinical psychology, broadened out to counseling and coaching, has...

basically ignored the agency of the person and and not systematically certainly taught people how to steepen their own growth curve based on how they're engaging the experiences they're having at the time that to me is the growth 2.0 model and to as you can tell i'm kind of revved up about it can i feel about it but here's a here's a weird fact um 40 years ago

basically ignored the agency of the person and and not systematically certainly taught people how to steepen their own growth curve based on how they're engaging the experiences they're having at the time that to me is the growth 2.0 model and to as you can tell i'm kind of revved up about it can i feel about it but here's a here's a weird fact um 40 years ago

basically ignored the agency of the person and and not systematically certainly taught people how to steepen their own growth curve based on how they're engaging the experiences they're having at the time that to me is the growth 2.0 model and to as you can tell i'm kind of revved up about it can i feel about it but here's a here's a weird fact um 40 years ago

Really good research on psychotherapy for, say, anxiety and depression showed that on average, there was a moderate effect size on average. Some people got more, some people got less, but the average in numerical terms, the way this is done, about 0.6. That's moderate. That's legitimate. It's credible. It doesn't work for everybody. Average benefit, pretty good. 40 years later,

Really good research on psychotherapy for, say, anxiety and depression showed that on average, there was a moderate effect size on average. Some people got more, some people got less, but the average in numerical terms, the way this is done, about 0.6. That's moderate. That's legitimate. It's credible. It doesn't work for everybody. Average benefit, pretty good. 40 years later,