Dr. Steven Greer

There used to be an old CNN anchor or interviewer named Larry King.

There used to be an old CNN anchor or interviewer named Larry King.

So he had to show Larry King live and he did a special with me before. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He was a fascinating guy. And but that was. 1994 and of course it's kind of disruptive to for a medical doctor to kind of step out on something this controversial back then now it's being talked about by the senate and the house and right the new york times but at that time it was like a

So he had to show Larry King live and he did a special with me before. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He was a fascinating guy. And but that was. 1994 and of course it's kind of disruptive to for a medical doctor to kind of step out on something this controversial back then now it's being talked about by the senate and the house and right the new york times but at that time it was like a

So he had to show Larry King live and he did a special with me before. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He was a fascinating guy. And but that was. 1994 and of course it's kind of disruptive to for a medical doctor to kind of step out on something this controversial back then now it's being talked about by the senate and the house and right the new york times but at that time it was like a

You're nuts if you're talking about UFOs, right? So it was kind of difficult for me to make that decision, too, because I said, well, I'm risking my medical license here. But it turned out I got no pushback medically at all.

You're nuts if you're talking about UFOs, right? So it was kind of difficult for me to make that decision, too, because I said, well, I'm risking my medical license here. But it turned out I got no pushback medically at all.

You're nuts if you're talking about UFOs, right? So it was kind of difficult for me to make that decision, too, because I said, well, I'm risking my medical license here. But it turned out I got no pushback medically at all.

It gets dismissed, too. Yeah, it reduces its credibility. So the way the intelligence community has worked on this is that they will have what are called NOCs, non-official cover. It'll be an editor at this network or this newspaper, and they will refuse to cover the facts on this. But they will divert it to a tabloid. Like National Enquirer, because it is inherently discrediting, right?

It gets dismissed, too. Yeah, it reduces its credibility. So the way the intelligence community has worked on this is that they will have what are called NOCs, non-official cover. It'll be an editor at this network or this newspaper, and they will refuse to cover the facts on this. But they will divert it to a tabloid. Like National Enquirer, because it is inherently discrediting, right?

It gets dismissed, too. Yeah, it reduces its credibility. So the way the intelligence community has worked on this is that they will have what are called NOCs, non-official cover. It'll be an editor at this network or this newspaper, and they will refuse to cover the facts on this. But they will divert it to a tabloid. Like National Enquirer, because it is inherently discrediting, right?

I mean, I'm not trying to put down the National Enquirer, but it's the kind of magazine that shows an alien with three heads having sex with Hillary Clinton and just nonsense. And so that immediately discredits something that is a very serious case, actually. So by association, it's neutralized.

I mean, I'm not trying to put down the National Enquirer, but it's the kind of magazine that shows an alien with three heads having sex with Hillary Clinton and just nonsense. And so that immediately discredits something that is a very serious case, actually. So by association, it's neutralized.

I mean, I'm not trying to put down the National Enquirer, but it's the kind of magazine that shows an alien with three heads having sex with Hillary Clinton and just nonsense. And so that immediately discredits something that is a very serious case, actually. So by association, it's neutralized.

Very clever.

Very clever.

Very clever.

So I've learned all the tricks of the intelligence community on this issue over 35 years of hard knocks and seeing how they do it and why they do it. Right. So that's to me, that's been the big learning curve over the last 30 some years of my life is figuring out. Who's holding these secrets? Why? The why is much harder to figure out than the what.

So I've learned all the tricks of the intelligence community on this issue over 35 years of hard knocks and seeing how they do it and why they do it. Right. So that's to me, that's been the big learning curve over the last 30 some years of my life is figuring out. Who's holding these secrets? Why? The why is much harder to figure out than the what.

So I've learned all the tricks of the intelligence community on this issue over 35 years of hard knocks and seeing how they do it and why they do it. Right. So that's to me, that's been the big learning curve over the last 30 some years of my life is figuring out. Who's holding these secrets? Why? The why is much harder to figure out than the what.