Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Libraries Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Eliezer Yudkowsky

๐Ÿ‘ค Speaker
See mentions of this person in podcasts
1716 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Something you can't do anything with.

It's not just an idiom for high abstract things like artificial intelligence.

It can apply in ordinary life too.

And the reason we don't think of the alternative explanation, I'm stupid, is not, I suspect, that we think so highly of ourselves.

It's just that we don't think of ourselves at all.

We just see a chaotic feature of the environment.

So now it's occurred to me that my productivity problem may not be chaos, but my own stupidity.

And that may or may not help anything.

It certainly doesn't fix the problem right away.

Saying, I'm ignorant, doesn't make you knowledgeable.

But it is at least a different path than saying it's too chaotic.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Argument screens off authority.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Black Belt Bazian, aka Steven, tries to explain the asymmetry between good arguments and good authority, but it doesn't seem to be resolving the comments on my blog post, Reversed Stupidity is Not Intelligence, so let me take my own stab at it.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Barry is a famous geologist.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Charles is a 14-year-old juvenile delinquent with a long arrest record and occasional psychotic episodes.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Barry flatly asserts to Arthur some counterintuitive statement about rocks, and Arthur judges it 90% probable.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Then, Charles makes an equally counterintuitive flat assertion about rocks, and Arthur judges it 10% probable.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Clearly, Arthur is taking the speaker's authority into account in deciding whether to believe the speaker's assertions.