Eliza Darris

speaker
314 appearances 2 recordings 1 series first heard Jan 2026 last heard 9 Mar

Eliza Darris’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
1 · Mar OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 2 in all, peaking in Mar 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
Even in cases like that, in cases of assault and others, the Attorney General's office would be able to, in a singular centralized fashion, apply the letter of the law
in the state of Minnesota to each of these cases, whereas the rights of our residents have been violated versus, you know, the diffracted energy that would be necessary, particularly from the advocacy community, going from county to county to county, trying to push and prod each of these various county attorneys to make the right decision, we would be able to singularly
look to the Attorney General's office as having point and taking lead for the investigations and prosecutions.
So from my perspective, what this does is it streamlines the process for us.
It allows for us to have a singular point of contact, a singular point.
What that means is if that charge and decision is then made, yes, we are likely going to find ourselves inside a federal court.
And at that point, the attorney general's office, the solicitor general's offices anyway would then step up and would begin arguing that the state of Minnesota has the right to bring these charges and that this would penetrate the veil that the federal government right now believes that it has through the supremacy clause that they believe allows their agents to act irrespective of our state laws.
I believe that there is a need
at this point to reimagine our jurisprudence and to create new case law and to challenge the practicality and the legality of how the supremacy clause has been interpreted over the past few decades.
And I think that these cases are the perfect cases to begin pushing and prodding that.
But none of that can happen without a charging decision.
So the governor, so at the point in which the governor then puts it into the attorney general's hands, who is also a duly elected government official, the governor is out of it and is in the hands of the attorney general to make that decision.
So whether the governor has an appetite or not, the only thing I need or the only thing we need for this governor to do is to have enough of an appetite to say, you know, we need to have more of a centralized command over the investigations and over the potential prosecution.
That's it.
It's 100 percent the governor's.
Yes.
So this this is so I just called for it this morning.
I just put the statement out this morning.
I'm going to do a media release as well.
This is one of the first interviews that that I'm doing about this.
Showing 21–40 of 314 · page 2 of 16 ← Previous Next →