Eric Schmidt

It has nothing to do with the first one.

It's the same pattern.

and they take the tools from one and they apply it to another.

Today, our systems cannot do that.

If we can get through that, I'm working on this, a technical term for this is non-stationarity of objectives.

The rules keep changing.

We will see if we can solve that problem.

If we can solve that, we're going to need even more data centers, and we'll also be able to invent completely new schools of scientific and intellectual thought, which will be incredible.

So Joshua is a brilliant inventor of much of what we're talking about and a good personal friend, and we've talked about this.

and his concerns are very legitimate.

The question is not, are his concerns right, but what are the solutions?

So let's think about agents.

So for purposes of argument, everyone in the audience is an agent.

You have an input that's English, or whatever language, and you have an output that's English, and you have memory, which is true of all humans.

Now, we're all busy working, and all of a sudden,

One of you decides it's much more efficient not to use human language, but we'll invent our own computer language.

Uh-oh.

Now, you and I are sitting here watching all of this, and we're saying, like, what do we do now?

The correct answer is unplug you.

Right?