Eric

And so if you started to do these things, Earlier in life, and again, as we reviewed earlier today, it's never too late, but these diseases could be avoided. The problem is most people who are 65 and have these chronic diseases have not followed these lifestyle plus factors, not taken advantage of what we know today.

And so if you started to do these things, Earlier in life, and again, as we reviewed earlier today, it's never too late, but these diseases could be avoided. The problem is most people who are 65 and have these chronic diseases have not followed these lifestyle plus factors, not taken advantage of what we know today.

diseases that young people get. We're not talking about that. We're talking about the ones that are clearly, there's certain types of cancer, most of them, in fact, and obviously the neurodegenerative and cardiovascular. These are the principal age-related diseases.

diseases that young people get. We're not talking about that. We're talking about the ones that are clearly, there's certain types of cancer, most of them, in fact, and obviously the neurodegenerative and cardiovascular. These are the principal age-related diseases.

diseases that young people get. We're not talking about that. We're talking about the ones that are clearly, there's certain types of cancer, most of them, in fact, and obviously the neurodegenerative and cardiovascular. These are the principal age-related diseases.

And that's what I think a lot of people don't understand is aging increases the risk, but we have ways to change that whole pace, that clock, if you will. And that's what is exciting now.

And that's what I think a lot of people don't understand is aging increases the risk, but we have ways to change that whole pace, that clock, if you will. And that's what is exciting now.

And that's what I think a lot of people don't understand is aging increases the risk, but we have ways to change that whole pace, that clock, if you will. And that's what is exciting now.

Yeah, this is an area that's so ripe to reboot, which is how we address cancer. So for example, the way we do cancer screening is unbelievable. It's by an age. So if you're age 50, you're supposed to have mammograms or 40 even now, or you have colonoscopies. And these screening procedures do very little to diagnose cancer. Most cancers are not diagnosed through screening.

Yeah, this is an area that's so ripe to reboot, which is how we address cancer. So for example, the way we do cancer screening is unbelievable. It's by an age. So if you're age 50, you're supposed to have mammograms or 40 even now, or you have colonoscopies. And these screening procedures do very little to diagnose cancer. Most cancers are not diagnosed through screening.

Yeah, this is an area that's so ripe to reboot, which is how we address cancer. So for example, the way we do cancer screening is unbelievable. It's by an age. So if you're age 50, you're supposed to have mammograms or 40 even now, or you have colonoscopies. And these screening procedures do very little to diagnose cancer. Most cancers are not diagnosed through screening.

And by the way, for breast cancer, for women... 88, almost 89% will never have breast cancer in their lives. So why are we putting women through frequent mammograms and other related procedures on a basis where they're never going to have the risk of breast cancer?

And by the way, for breast cancer, for women... 88, almost 89% will never have breast cancer in their lives. So why are we putting women through frequent mammograms and other related procedures on a basis where they're never going to have the risk of breast cancer?

And by the way, for breast cancer, for women... 88, almost 89% will never have breast cancer in their lives. So why are we putting women through frequent mammograms and other related procedures on a basis where they're never going to have the risk of breast cancer?

Why don't we screen people, which we can, for their genetic risk so that we can say, you know what, you might have a mammogram every 10 years. You might never need one or you should have a frequent one. And maybe not only with the mammogram, but perhaps other imaging modalities. So we don't particularize the person's risk and we treat everybody like we're all the same. So that's one issue.

Why don't we screen people, which we can, for their genetic risk so that we can say, you know what, you might have a mammogram every 10 years. You might never need one or you should have a frequent one. And maybe not only with the mammogram, but perhaps other imaging modalities. So we don't particularize the person's risk and we treat everybody like we're all the same. So that's one issue.

Why don't we screen people, which we can, for their genetic risk so that we can say, you know what, you might have a mammogram every 10 years. You might never need one or you should have a frequent one. And maybe not only with the mammogram, but perhaps other imaging modalities. So we don't particularize the person's risk and we treat everybody like we're all the same. So that's one issue.

The key is finding out who is at increased risk and then putting those people under surveillance. So we have this really great test now we never had before, which is called multi-cancer early detection. And so from a blood test, we could say there's a microscopic cancer. The problem is we're using it completely wrong now.

The key is finding out who is at increased risk and then putting those people under surveillance. So we have this really great test now we never had before, which is called multi-cancer early detection. And so from a blood test, we could say there's a microscopic cancer. The problem is we're using it completely wrong now.

The key is finding out who is at increased risk and then putting those people under surveillance. So we have this really great test now we never had before, which is called multi-cancer early detection. And so from a blood test, we could say there's a microscopic cancer. The problem is we're using it completely wrong now.