Fan 4

I think my biggest gripe with your argument is the word laughably. I think your top 10 NBA players of all time is well-documented. You've got people like Larry Bird in there.

You've got Shaq in there.

You know, those two guys, within the last three to five years, have deferred to LeBron and called LeBron the GOAT.

Verbatim, Larry Bird said, LeBron is one of, if not the greatest ever. You have him out, I think, at number seven.

So if you look this up, Shaq also said that LeBron is the greatest ever. So with that being said, if Shaq is deferred to LeBron and said he's the greatest ever, that would at least make him three. He deferred to that. He gave him three. So the word laughably is really crazy to me because also you've called LeBron weak. You've called him soft. Mentally weak.

Mentally soft. It takes a lot of mental fortitude to play in the NBA for 22 years. It takes a lot of mental fortitude to be called the king at age 13, 14, and live up to all those expectations without a hiccup off the court, without being in the news for a negative reason. It takes a lot of mental fortitude to do that.

Which would be a clutch shot.

One thing about the epic failures, about the epic failures. Yeah. Would you call Jordan getting swept in the first round three times an epic failure?

To call someone LeBrick while having the most points ever is wild. Now, I know you're a Jordan guy. It pained me to say that Jordan's been swept three times in the first round, because I'm a Jordan guy too. But to laughably say that LeBron and Jordan aren't even in the same conversation, That's wild, it's a discredit to basketball.

But- So what do you have to say about Shaq deferring to LeBron? I'm sorry. He said it. PR. He said it. Why would he say that though? Why does a killer say that?

That's his expertise. That's