Garrett Ziegler
speaker
36 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Jan 2025
last heard Jan 2025
Garrett Ziegler’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
It's one thing if you don't go to college right and you're – you have street smarts, you're quick-witted, you don't need it. Jimmy, on the other hand, just from reading the emails, Charlie, has the communication skills like a sixth grader. So he's not even – He's not even impressive in his own right.
It would be one thing if the Bidens grifted and were very adept and suave people and articulate, right? But they're not even that. They're the worst version of Joe, the gaffe machine. So that makes it – that ups the ante and makes this thing even more of a comedy because it's one thing to be corrupt but impressive. They're not even impressive.
And the only reason why we know so much of their criminal activity is because the smartest man Joe says he knows left a laptop at a repair shop. So they have no one else to blame. And, of course, even their pardons, even Jimmy's pardon, Sarah, Valerie, John, Frankie, and Hunter's has not stopped them from dropping their lawsuit against us.
We have a trial scheduled with Hunter in Los Angeles federal court September 6th of this year.
Probably. I say probably because they could still call Hunter and Jimmy in in the likely lie under oath. So it's contingent upon Trump's new U.S. attorneys having courage to charge them on perjury charges when they inevitably do lie. So I would urge the Congress –
Sarah, she definitely needs to lose her bar license, and she did commit money laundering, but she won't know as much as Jimmy and Hunter. So I would urge the Congress to bring them in, and of course that immunity ended January 19th. So anything going forward is fair game from a federal level. But one of the great sad stories about this saga is that the Republican AGs and county DAs didn't look –
and didn't basically enforce the law. There's no state-level immunity for Hunter and Jimmy because of these pardons. And every single crime they committed, whether it's drugs, money laundering, prostitution, they all have a local jurisdiction component. Now, to be frank, a lot of these occurred in blue states, a lot in Connecticut, a lot in New York, a lot in DC, a lot in California.
However, Hunter's financial advisor, Edward Pruitt, lives in Fayetteville, Arkansas, where Bill and Hillary used to teach. That jurisdiction, by virtue of Hunter's financial advisor being there, every single one of these wire transfers that Hunter Biden facilitated using Wells Fargo, it has jurisdiction in Arkansas. Now, there are a couple of them that are still within the statute of limitations.
Most of them have passed. Of course, we've gone in and looked at what the statute of limitation is for money laundering in Arkansas. For some offenses, depending on the dollar amount, it's six years. For most, it's five years. So we're getting at the end of that. But I think there was no excuse, and the left figured this out.
Now, their cases were ridiculous, and they each had a federal component to them, especially the Stormy Daniels hoax. It's a federal election component. But Hunter and Jimmy Biden's cases are much more clear cut. They used Arkansas wires, namely their financial advisor in Fayetteville, to facilitate transactions which engaged in money laundering. That is undeniable.
And even if before January 19th, somebody heard me say that. And they doubted it, and they didn't read our 644-page book. I know I sent you guys some copies. They just need to go look at the pardon. They have to see the breadth of this thing. One more point of privilege I want to bring up. The federal judge in Hunter's Los Angeles case, the same district in which he's suing us civilly,
raked Joe over the coals because there is a portion of Joe's pardon to Hunter and his recent pardon of his siblings and their spouses that is not valid, and here it is. When he pardoned Hunter and he pardoned those folks on January 19th, he said the pardon went through the date of the pardon. That is – for a couple of hours, that is unenforceable.
What I mean by that is Joe didn't sign these things at 1159. In the case of Hunter, we know that for a fact. We know he signed it around 530 because they announced it at 6. And of course Joe is fed, wiped, and put to bed at about 8.30 every night. So we know he's not up until 11.59 signing these things. For the amount of hours – and this is technical, but just bear with me.
For the amount of hours that still were in those two days and after he signed it, you cannot pardon prospective conduct. So the judge in Hunter's federal case said we're not – it's not going to affect this case, but just for the record – Those six hours that occurred from 6 p.m. to midnight on December 1, 2024, that's not covered by the pardon, and yet Joe said it was.
So he made this mistake again with his siblings. You thought the staff secretary, the Biden equivalent of Will Scharf, the staff secretary, would have made it through the day before. Joe's pardon should have said through January 18 because those hours – It's just pathetic.
That's why I wanted to bring it up, is they made the mistake again, even after a federal judge excoriated them in the case of Hunter.
Showing 21–36 of 36 · page 2 of 2
← Previous