Gary Brecka

He ended up staying here for a couple extra months because he's gotten so frail in older ages.

But what are concrete things that you can do?

Because there are some big legislative wins.

I mean, I want to give you credit for

you know, folinic acid, you know, being added as a frontline defense for some of these neurodevelopmental disorders.

I love to see nutrients, raw materials, vitamins, minerals, amino acids being used to combat those deficiencies.

Big, you know, tip of the hat for removing the black box warnings from female hormone therapy, because as somebody who is married to a woman that just went through menopause,

and someone that has been in the functional wellness space for about 11 years, so many women suffered unnecessarily.

And because as soon as you said estrogen, they thought breast cancer.

And you talked about a little bit about this study, the Women's Health Initiative and how the study actually found the polar opposite of what was reported.

How does that happen?

How do you take data that's resolute and then restructure that data and create a mass misinformation campaign?

What would be the impetus for something like that?

It's old fashioned medical dogma.

Careers were built on certain ideas.

So one hypothesis was that women should not be taking estrogen because it could increase the risk of breast cancer.

And the guy who led that study, the famous Women's Health Initiative study that was first published in 2002, had gone on record, I found out when I looked into this, he'd gone on record saying in a medical journal, we have to stop the HRT bandwagon.

In other words, we got to get women off this.

Well, you haven't done this study yet.

The purpose of science is you evaluate the data as it comes in.