Gavin de Becker

In other words, all we're going to get is exactly what we're being paid to sit here and do.

That's what America was asking them to do.

And so all these – I'll just do one more.

There's a guy, Dr. Goodman, and he says to the group, I've got something big.

He says it's not – it's still sort of rough, but – and then he rolls out this big invention of his.

I call it the three-category system.

That is high, intermediate, and inadequate, with the other two categories being no evidence at all or favors acceptance.

And he says what we're looking for is an argument that is embedded inside the rhetoric, an argument that might be of some value to parse out and take pieces of and make sure that we address it in its pieces.

That's like a fucking Scrabble set that turned upside down.

It doesn't make any sense.

But I'm not a scientist, so I shouldn't be able to opine on it, but that's why.

But it's clear what they're doing.

What they're doing is trying to make that water as muddy as possible.

Then they come out.

with their report, and not only do they come out with their report saying that there's no link between any vaccine and any autism in any child, not only that, but they say it should not be further studied.

These guys who will do study after study after study for years, because they're getting paid for it, on this one they decide no more studies.

I mean, it's quite remarkable.

And that is the thing that allows everybody to say to you and to me and to Bobby Kennedy, oh, that's debunked.

That's how it happened.

That's the debunking.