Glenn Loury

Um, so what, what happened next? Well, next, the outfit called Air Wars, A-I-R-W-A-R-S, Air Wars, which is an initiative to study the consequences of aerial bombardment in conflict, put out a report documenting the extensive civilian casualties that were being engendered by the bombing attacks that Israel was conducting in Gaza.

And I had one of the people who was sympathetic to the report on the show to discuss the report about civilian casualties. Basically, he was arguing that the number of women and children killed relative to the number of combatants killed was exceptionally high. and reflected tactics that you could question as to whether or not they were absolutely necessary.

And I had one of the people who was sympathetic to the report on the show to discuss the report about civilian casualties. Basically, he was arguing that the number of women and children killed relative to the number of combatants killed was exceptionally high. and reflected tactics that you could question as to whether or not they were absolutely necessary.

And I had one of the people who was sympathetic to the report on the show to discuss the report about civilian casualties. Basically, he was arguing that the number of women and children killed relative to the number of combatants killed was exceptionally high. and reflected tactics that you could question as to whether or not they were absolutely necessary.

I mean, he made a collective punishment argument. And I had him in a debate. This guy's name is Andrew Cockerell. He's a historian, Ph.D. student at the London School of Economics. I had him on with Eli Lake, who's a journalist, writes about Middle East and other international affairs.

I mean, he made a collective punishment argument. And I had him in a debate. This guy's name is Andrew Cockerell. He's a historian, Ph.D. student at the London School of Economics. I had him on with Eli Lake, who's a journalist, writes about Middle East and other international affairs.

I mean, he made a collective punishment argument. And I had him in a debate. This guy's name is Andrew Cockerell. He's a historian, Ph.D. student at the London School of Economics. I had him on with Eli Lake, who's a journalist, writes about Middle East and other international affairs.

Yeah, well, he's not very prominent.

Yeah, well, he's not very prominent.

Yeah, well, he's not very prominent.

Yeah, both sides were represented, and they had their back and forth about how do you interpret the data on civilian casualties and the bombardment, aerial bombardment.

Yeah, both sides were represented, and they had their back and forth about how do you interpret the data on civilian casualties and the bombardment, aerial bombardment.

Yeah, both sides were represented, and they had their back and forth about how do you interpret the data on civilian casualties and the bombardment, aerial bombardment.

And then I did a kind of me directly to the camera, 10 minute or 15 minute reflection on the interview as a bonus feature of the podcast, which we make available to paying subscribers and where I interact with someone from my staff who basically interviews me about the interview that I did. And I was asked, did I learn anything from Eli Lake? And I said, what was I going to learn?

And then I did a kind of me directly to the camera, 10 minute or 15 minute reflection on the interview as a bonus feature of the podcast, which we make available to paying subscribers and where I interact with someone from my staff who basically interviews me about the interview that I did. And I was asked, did I learn anything from Eli Lake? And I said, what was I going to learn?

And then I did a kind of me directly to the camera, 10 minute or 15 minute reflection on the interview as a bonus feature of the podcast, which we make available to paying subscribers and where I interact with someone from my staff who basically interviews me about the interview that I did. And I was asked, did I learn anything from Eli Lake? And I said, what was I going to learn?

And I basically recounted my view, which I've already described here, of what has been proceeding there in Gaza as a collective punishment that I don't think is justified. And I said to him, I said, no, he said nothing that dissuade me from that point of view. And that got posted.

And I basically recounted my view, which I've already described here, of what has been proceeding there in Gaza as a collective punishment that I don't think is justified. And I said to him, I said, no, he said nothing that dissuade me from that point of view. And that got posted.

And I basically recounted my view, which I've already described here, of what has been proceeding there in Gaza as a collective punishment that I don't think is justified. And I said to him, I said, no, he said nothing that dissuade me from that point of view. And that got posted.

And I got notified the next day that the Manhattan Institute was discontinuing its relationship with me as a senior fellow. How did they tell you? I got a note from Raihan saying, as I've mentioned, that we do review our scholar connections from time to time for productivity and shared priorities. And we've decided not to continue to work with you. The next day? Yeah. Did he call you? No.