Gregg Braden
speaker
2,876 appearances
6 recordings
4 series
first heard Dec 2024
last heard 1 Oct
Gregg Braden’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Oct 2025 with 1.
Appearances
When you look at where the technological revolution that we're seeing right now, where it's leading, and what the logical outcome is within the context of all the other things that are happening in the world, we are geoengineering this planet in a way that is not good for us, pushing the carbon dioxide levels down to dangerous, dangerous levels that are near extinction levels in the geologic past.
That's not good for us. pushing the temperatures down an average of 10 degrees Fahrenheit from 59 to actually more than that, about 46 degrees Fahrenheit, that's not good for us. We are creating wars between the superpowers, expending weapons and manpower, depleting our abilities as a planet to defend ourselves. That's not good for us.
Now we are in the process of being indoctrinated to accept technology into our bodies, relinquishing our biology and our divinity, our divine qualities of empathy, sympathy, emotion, compassion, forgiveness, creativity, innovation, imagination. Those are all facets of human divinity that are lost when we replace our biology with technology. That's not good for us. So is it a form of evolution?
It's an artificial or a forced evolution. It's not a natural evolution. And in my opinion, and in defense of our humanness, this is why I wrote the book, at least to bring an awareness to what it is that we're about to give away before we give it away. Because once again, once we do, we cannot go back.
You know, one of the beautiful things, I worked in the high-tech industry from 1979 till mid-90s. And I saw amazing technology. Someone was here in California during the Cold War years. I worked on Norton Air Force Base, Vandenberg Air Force Base, not far from here. Amazing technology. I mean, laser technology and communications and radar.
And as sophisticated as they all were, Andre, I never, to this day, I've never seen any technology built in the world around us that doesn't mimic what we already do in ourselves, except we do it better
And the beauty of this inner technology, one of the things I learned when I was in the industry is that the more complex, the more sophisticated the system is behind the scenes, the simpler the user interface. We are so complex. We are such an advanced form of soft technology that the user interface is deceptively simple. Thought, feeling, emotion, breath, focus, movement, nutrition.
the core of our most ancient and cherished spiritual traditions. They didn't know the science, but they were helping us to make the best of our humanness and to develop it in extraordinary ways. Now the science has forgotten that. So I'm just going to say this is a very different way of thinking of the human body.
because we're conditioned, I went to school in 1950s, 60s, early 1970s, and I was conditioned to think of the human body as a frail, vulnerable, biological system, sticky, wet, gooey stuff inside the cells. And here's the revolution. Now, scientists all over the world are beginning to think of the human body from the perspective of IT, information technology.
And so people say, why don't we know about these new discoveries? The answer is because the discoveries are published in engineering journals. They're not published in biological textbooks, like IEEE, for example, and the Journal of Advanced Computing Systems, things like that.
And they're looking at the human body from an information technology perspective, and they're blown away by what they're seeing. We talked about this in a previous interview. The circuits, every one of the 50 trillion cells in our body is an electrical circuit. Transistors, resistors, those equivalents are in the body.
The DNA are literally, and this is directly from an engineering journal, the DNA is being called a resonant fractal antennae. What that means is that we are picking up information across the broad spectrum of information sources, rather than you think of an antenna zeroing in on one station somewhere.
We're picking it up from everywhere simultaneously, and we're processing it from the DNA into the nervous system, through the body, into the brain. And when they begin looking at us from an IT perspective, I mean, they're... Engineers are clamoring to recreate in a laboratory what we do in our bodies, and they cannot do it.
And the reason they cannot do that is because of our humanness and our divinity that allows us as resin antenna to tune to information that's not in our physical bodies, but it permeates the world that we live in. There's a big conversation there.
So yeah, as a natural form of evolution, we would lose access to all of that if we replace the membranes of our cells, the neurons in our brain, and the DNA in our bodies with synthetics and artificial components, we lose that. So I guess maybe the question, Andre, is what kind of evolution do we want?
Here's the... I agree with you. And here's the problem. Not all the changes are by choice. There is a relatively small number of people that view themselves as technological elite that know better... than everyone else what is good for us, what's good for our world, what's good for our human species. And it's always been that way, even before we had the technology we have today.
And I've never had any problem with any of that. Where this gets concerning is those thinkers, for example, the World Economic Forum, WEF, developed 1971. They get together every year. Davos, Switzerland, we all hear about it. We see it on the news, you know, the private jets going in and... and the mysterious meetings and all of that.
And they have every right to get together and think about the world that they want. These are elite business leaders, CEOs of major corporations, major financial institutions, government leaders, things like that.
What changed is in 2019, they formalized an agreement with the United Nations through what is now called the UN SDG 2030, United Nations Sustainable Development Goals for 2030, 17 goals that are intended to be implemented within five years now, because we're now almost 2025. That's not very long. The goals are beautiful goals when you look at them by title.
Things like food security and child health, planetary global child health. I mean, who doesn't want that? We all want that. Now, you look at the fine print. And you say, how are they going to achieve those goals in such a brief period of time? And the level of social engineering that has to happen if they are going to achieve those goals is staggering. It is nothing short of a social revolution.
Showing 2141–2160 of 2,876 · page 108 of 144
← Previous
Next →