Haley Carinia

So with that said, he was also interested in like very buff females, muscle building erotica.

But interestingly enough, no motive was left, like no manifesto, didn't leave a letter, didn't leave anything and nothing in his online search history or or comments on YouTube or anything like that.

They couldn't find anything that said, you know, this is why I'm going to attack President Trump.

This is why I want him dead.

None of that.

So no official motive, which is interesting as well.

But it is the FBI's conclusion that Thomas Crooks acted alone.

And the FBI can only they can only investigate based on a lawful predicate to open.

So what Kash Patel was explaining also in this interview was

Could they have, you know, seen these posts online?

Could they have looked at his online activity and opened an investigation into him?

Not really.

Kash Patel argued that, you know, the American public probably doesn't want the FBI scouring social media posts and content without a lawful predicate to do so because that would trample First Amendment rights.

But the FBI is maintained that if someone had called in a lead, they would have investigated that lead.

But that didn't happen.

But it is interesting to to think about, you know, if if he was on YouTube and he said things like kill Democrats and members of the squad like AOC, you

Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, he wrote that squad members should suffer a quick and painful death.

So, you know, he had some like, I don't know, anti-Democrat posts, but also anti-Republican posts.

He said that the only way to fight government with terrorism and you could fight government with terrorism style attacks is

He wanted to sneak a bomb into an essential building and set it off before anyone sees you.