Hallie Rubenhold

It's not true.

You speak to absolutely anybody who uses this technology today for identifying remains or identifying evidence in trials.

They will tell you it is not a silver bullet.

It's not foolproof at all.

But more to the point, I got Professor Turi King, who was responsible for helping to identify the remains of Richard III.

She's one of the top experts in the country on this, to have a look at the white paper that was produced off the back of this.

And she looked at it and she said, this just simply doesn't hold water.

There are all sorts of problems with this, none the least because they threw bleach on the remains, which degrades DNA.

And so that is in the appendix to my book.

But there should be no doubt at all that Crippen was guilty.

The fact of the matter was, there was a lot of other evidence.

His wife disappears.

Physical remains are found in his basement.

I mean, come on.

Nobody ever sees her again, ever.

She doesn't see her family.

She doesn't see her friends.

The man she was supposed to have run away with.

hasn't seen her.

Not only that, but in the gravesite, they find part of Crippen's pyjamas.