Harmeet Dhillon
đ€ SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Tucker, it's a mental health issue.
Tucker, it's a mental health issue.
Tucker, it's a mental health issue.
Well, apparently the police dispatcher is supposed to know by that 911 call that they shouldn't have sent a cop. They should have sent a social worker. I mean, it's an insane standard.
Well, apparently the police dispatcher is supposed to know by that 911 call that they shouldn't have sent a cop. They should have sent a social worker. I mean, it's an insane standard.
Well, apparently the police dispatcher is supposed to know by that 911 call that they shouldn't have sent a cop. They should have sent a social worker. I mean, it's an insane standard.
The federal government, DOJ, has been reaching those factual findings and then asking federal judges to impose... Thick, decade-long, minutely detailed consent decrees out of which cities struggle to get out of. You know, the average consent decree, Tucker, when the United States Department of Justice bullies a city into agreeing to it is over a decade.
The federal government, DOJ, has been reaching those factual findings and then asking federal judges to impose... Thick, decade-long, minutely detailed consent decrees out of which cities struggle to get out of. You know, the average consent decree, Tucker, when the United States Department of Justice bullies a city into agreeing to it is over a decade.
The federal government, DOJ, has been reaching those factual findings and then asking federal judges to impose... Thick, decade-long, minutely detailed consent decrees out of which cities struggle to get out of. You know, the average consent decree, Tucker, when the United States Department of Justice bullies a city into agreeing to it is over a decade.
So the problem isn't solved quickly by all the taxpayer dollars, the monitor, the police reform, the community policing councils and groups that are set up in these consent decrees. The judge overseeing it, the problem that was identified isn't solved. In fact, it turns out that when you fund investigations and you fund monitoring,
So the problem isn't solved quickly by all the taxpayer dollars, the monitor, the police reform, the community policing councils and groups that are set up in these consent decrees. The judge overseeing it, the problem that was identified isn't solved. In fact, it turns out that when you fund investigations and you fund monitoring,
So the problem isn't solved quickly by all the taxpayer dollars, the monitor, the police reform, the community policing councils and groups that are set up in these consent decrees. The judge overseeing it, the problem that was identified isn't solved. In fact, it turns out that when you fund investigations and you fund monitoring,
and a monitor decides when you're good enough and your performance has improved, you get more monitoring. You get more years of that. You get more fees paid to big law firms like Hogan Lovells and some other big law firms in the United States. And the citizens pay the bill. So it's a tax on Americans who live in cities because one cop, or maybe no cops in some cases, did something wrong.
and a monitor decides when you're good enough and your performance has improved, you get more monitoring. You get more years of that. You get more fees paid to big law firms like Hogan Lovells and some other big law firms in the United States. And the citizens pay the bill. So it's a tax on Americans who live in cities because one cop, or maybe no cops in some cases, did something wrong.
and a monitor decides when you're good enough and your performance has improved, you get more monitoring. You get more years of that. You get more fees paid to big law firms like Hogan Lovells and some other big law firms in the United States. And the citizens pay the bill. So it's a tax on Americans who live in cities because one cop, or maybe no cops in some cases, did something wrong.
And so it's a totally broken system. And when we came into office, it was a priority of this administration to review all pending consent decrees, all consent decrees that had yet to be entered by a judge, all pre-consent decree factual findings found by the Department of Justice and announced publicly shaming these cities, and look at the data and see, are these really justified?
And so it's a totally broken system. And when we came into office, it was a priority of this administration to review all pending consent decrees, all consent decrees that had yet to be entered by a judge, all pre-consent decree factual findings found by the Department of Justice and announced publicly shaming these cities, and look at the data and see, are these really justified?
And so it's a totally broken system. And when we came into office, it was a priority of this administration to review all pending consent decrees, all consent decrees that had yet to be entered by a judge, all pre-consent decree factual findings found by the Department of Justice and announced publicly shaming these cities, and look at the data and see, are these really justified?
And our immediate conclusion, by the way, not just our conclusion, in the case of Minneapolis and Louisville, Federal judges to which these were presented had some tough questions. And in the case of Louisville, the judge asked the DOJ lawyers, these DOJ lawyers I've described from the Civil Rights Division, to explain themselves. How did you reach that conclusion?
And our immediate conclusion, by the way, not just our conclusion, in the case of Minneapolis and Louisville, Federal judges to which these were presented had some tough questions. And in the case of Louisville, the judge asked the DOJ lawyers, these DOJ lawyers I've described from the Civil Rights Division, to explain themselves. How did you reach that conclusion?