Harriet Hageman

It's wonderful to be with you, Dr. Drew.

It's wonderful to be with you, Dr. Drew.

It was an incredibly, incredible speech. It was full of hope, aspiration. It talked about a new renaissance in America. It was exciting to be there. And I think it was pretty sad, the display that the Democrats put on last night. And it was obvious that they had made the decision before they ever walked into the chambers that they were not going to clap, they were not going to stand.

It was an incredibly, incredible speech. It was full of hope, aspiration. It talked about a new renaissance in America. It was exciting to be there. And I think it was pretty sad, the display that the Democrats put on last night. And it was obvious that they had made the decision before they ever walked into the chambers that they were not going to clap, they were not going to stand.

They were not going to react positively to anything that the president said. And he said that at the very beginning. He said, you'll never clap for me. You'll never stand for me. You'll never do anything positive. And I do think it reflected on them very poorly.

They were not going to react positively to anything that the president said. And he said that at the very beginning. He said, you'll never clap for me. You'll never stand for me. You'll never do anything positive. And I do think it reflected on them very poorly.

I think it's very similar. And I watched that clip with great interest simply because I worked with Jay Bhattacharya during the middle of that. I was involved in one of the very first lawsuits in the United States that was filed against the vaccine mandates. I'm a person who believes very strong in freedom. And I also believe in the science of these things.

I think it's very similar. And I watched that clip with great interest simply because I worked with Jay Bhattacharya during the middle of that. I was involved in one of the very first lawsuits in the United States that was filed against the vaccine mandates. I'm a person who believes very strong in freedom. And I also believe in the science of these things.

And it was very clear to me early on that what we were being told related to COVID was dishonest and it was a mechanism to control the masses. And I think that you could look at climate change and global warming exactly the same way. It has evolved over the time from the 1970s to the 1980s to the 90s.

And it was very clear to me early on that what we were being told related to COVID was dishonest and it was a mechanism to control the masses. And I think that you could look at climate change and global warming exactly the same way. It has evolved over the time from the 1970s to the 1980s to the 90s.

And I read something the other day that I think is very important, which is you probably shouldn't put a deadline on Armageddon. And yet they have because they can't help themselves. All of the glaciers will be gone by 2012. And there will be no more ice. Antarctica will be gone by 2021.

And I read something the other day that I think is very important, which is you probably shouldn't put a deadline on Armageddon. And yet they have because they can't help themselves. All of the glaciers will be gone by 2012. And there will be no more ice. Antarctica will be gone by 2021.

And you got to stop giving us a deadline because when they pass, we can all look at the predictions that were made and call them out for what they're saying. And climate change and global warming-

And you got to stop giving us a deadline because when they pass, we can all look at the predictions that were made and call them out for what they're saying. And climate change and global warming-

What's interesting is if there's a hole in the ozone layer, which is what we were being told in the 70s and 80s, and we were all going to die. If there's a hole in the ozone layer, you don't have the greenhouse gas effect that they're now- Exactly, exactly. Global warming and climate change. They keep switching it up, I guess, to keep us unsure as to where they're going to go next.

What's interesting is if there's a hole in the ozone layer, which is what we were being told in the 70s and 80s, and we were all going to die. If there's a hole in the ozone layer, you don't have the greenhouse gas effect that they're now- Exactly, exactly. Global warming and climate change. They keep switching it up, I guess, to keep us unsure as to where they're going to go next.

What they ignore is the fact that we have the ability to innovate. And I think that that's the point you're making when you talk about being a time traveler. Whenever they make these predictions, they're essentially assuming that nothing is going to change in our ability to adapt to that particular situation. If you've got erosion, then you deal with it by building a cement wall.

What they ignore is the fact that we have the ability to innovate. And I think that that's the point you're making when you talk about being a time traveler. Whenever they make these predictions, they're essentially assuming that nothing is going to change in our ability to adapt to that particular situation. If you've got erosion, then you deal with it by building a cement wall.

If you've got a situation where we have the catastrophic forest fires, which we actually do, but that's caused by bad forest management. then we can better manage those resources. Just like what we recently saw in California, the amount of carbon and particulates and toxins that went into the air as a result of that fire, humanity would not be responsible for over the next several hundred years.

If you've got a situation where we have the catastrophic forest fires, which we actually do, but that's caused by bad forest management. then we can better manage those resources. Just like what we recently saw in California, the amount of carbon and particulates and toxins that went into the air as a result of that fire, humanity would not be responsible for over the next several hundred years.