Harriet Hageman

As an attorney, I've encountered the California Coastal Commission before. And again, that is one of those agencies that has become very totalitarian in its viewpoint of the world. And I'll go back again to these fires. Over 50% of the fires in Southern California are started either by arson or homeless, or maybe it's a combination of both.

As an attorney, I've encountered the California Coastal Commission before. And again, that is one of those agencies that has become very totalitarian in its viewpoint of the world. And I'll go back again to these fires. Over 50% of the fires in Southern California are started either by arson or homeless, or maybe it's a combination of both.

And I know that there's also some issues associated with fires related to power lines. But the fact is that what happened in November was largely a man-made disaster because they want the California Coastal Commission and the various so-called environmental agencies out there will not allow the clearing of the brush.

And I know that there's also some issues associated with fires related to power lines. But the fact is that what happened in November was largely a man-made disaster because they want the California Coastal Commission and the various so-called environmental agencies out there will not allow the clearing of the brush.

Under the 2001 roadless rule that was put in place by Bill Clinton, denied access, management, and use to 58.5 million acres of National Forest Service lands. These are all really bad policies that end up destroying our environment And yet it's the environmentalists that push forward with them.

Under the 2001 roadless rule that was put in place by Bill Clinton, denied access, management, and use to 58.5 million acres of National Forest Service lands. These are all really bad policies that end up destroying our environment And yet it's the environmentalists that push forward with them.

But then we eventually have to pick up the pieces and then deal with the consequences of those terrible decisions. Because, again, they will not consider opportunity costs when they adopt these sweeping, sweeping, sweeping declarations of how they're going to allow us to use our property. It really does need to change.

But then we eventually have to pick up the pieces and then deal with the consequences of those terrible decisions. Because, again, they will not consider opportunity costs when they adopt these sweeping, sweeping, sweeping declarations of how they're going to allow us to use our property. It really does need to change.

So one of the things that they've done is they've so corrupted the climate data that it's essentially unusable at this period in time. And most of their work is being done by the models, which is garbage in, garbage out. They're computer models. So what do I mean by destroying the climate data? They homogenize between two weather stations.

So one of the things that they've done is they've so corrupted the climate data that it's essentially unusable at this period in time. And most of their work is being done by the models, which is garbage in, garbage out. They're computer models. So what do I mean by destroying the climate data? They homogenize between two weather stations.

So you might have a weather station that has a 100-year history of out in a field which has not been changed. And when they go gather that data, they can demonstrate, we can demonstrate that there's no trend line in that data. You're not seeing increased warming or decreased temperatures. What you're seeing is variability, which is called weather.

So you might have a weather station that has a 100-year history of out in a field which has not been changed. And when they go gather that data, they can demonstrate, we can demonstrate that there's no trend line in that data. You're not seeing increased warming or decreased temperatures. What you're seeing is variability, which is called weather.

But the stations that they manipulate, so let's say there was a station out east of Denver 40 years ago. Well, now we have DIA. That weather station may still exist, but it is now being affected by what's often referred to as the urban heat index or other types of development around that. So they need to adjust that data. But instead of adjusting the temperatures down to account for

But the stations that they manipulate, so let's say there was a station out east of Denver 40 years ago. Well, now we have DIA. That weather station may still exist, but it is now being affected by what's often referred to as the urban heat index or other types of development around that. So they need to adjust that data. But instead of adjusting the temperatures down to account for

all of this development in industrial activity around it, they actually increase the temperature using that data. So what they've done, and they talked about it in all of the emails with the East Anglian University, they manipulate the data. They're not using raw data and saying,

all of this development in industrial activity around it, they actually increase the temperature using that data. So what they've done, and they talked about it in all of the emails with the East Anglian University, they manipulate the data. They're not using raw data and saying,

You can look at a weather station that has been unimpacted by man, essentially, and what you'll see is that there is no warming trend. What you'll see is variability called weather. So we know that they're manipulating the data. We know they're manipulating the temperature. NOAA has satellite data, temperature data. They won't share it. They also won't tell us how they're manipulating the data.

You can look at a weather station that has been unimpacted by man, essentially, and what you'll see is that there is no warming trend. What you'll see is variability called weather. So we know that they're manipulating the data. We know they're manipulating the temperature. NOAA has satellite data, temperature data. They won't share it. They also won't tell us how they're manipulating the data.

It's a black box. They won't tell us how they make these adjustments. But if you watch their data, if you watch their ticker tape, if you will, you can watch it happen in real time. This is what they're doing. We are being manipulated to the tune of trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars worldwide. And much of it is based upon manipulated data.

It's a black box. They won't tell us how they make these adjustments. But if you watch their data, if you watch their ticker tape, if you will, you can watch it happen in real time. This is what they're doing. We are being manipulated to the tune of trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars worldwide. And much of it is based upon manipulated data.