Harry Litman

speaker

299 appearances 6 recordings 1 series first heard May 2025 last heard 26 Jul

Harry Litman’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 5 in all, peaking in Jul 2026 with 4.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

The MeidasTouch Podcast · Trump Scheme is Smoked Out and He Rufuses Oath · 22 Jun 2026 podcast

And to just go at the intricacies of the law a little bit more, like the other cases with the slush fund, with the possible exception of one, the standing argument here is pretty tenuous.

And it might not get them out of the box, but they have made it now, has the administration, about this mootness thing.

So she can just put to the side whether Floyd, the plaintiff and others have standing and say, I want to I've got to figure out whether it's moot.

And if you won't give me anything more than this, I'm going to go forward.

I'm going to order a briefing for a few weeks from now.

And I don't see mootness here, whatever you want to say about Todd Blanch.

And that is just a straightforward legal question.

Now, they are really rattling sabers here, is the DOJ.

And what they're basically saying is, yeah, just try us, Brinkema.

We're going to yank you to the Fourth Circuit.

And they might.

The Fourth Circuit has been not so reliably for Trump, even their sort of conservative folks like J. Harvey Wilkinson.

And really, all she's saying here is it isn't moot.

And if she says, I'm not accepting this to be moot, and they bring an emergency motion to the Fourth Circuit, what are they going to say exactly?

What's the irreparable harm?

And if the status in her case is this ain't moot, to me, that doubles back potentially to the whole political landscape in the Senate and Congress where people said,

we don't like this damn fund, and we don't think it's been put to bed.

We have a federal court saying this isn't moot, and that rehashes the whole political controversy that made them have to back down from the suit in the first place.

So I think because of their obstreperousness, and as you say, caginess, squirreliness, they have bought a battle with another federal judge, kind of like,

as they've done in a few others.

Showing 241–260 of 299 · page 13 of 15