Haseeb Qureshi

We one-shotted it.

Our bad UX is their good UX.

Exactly, exactly.

And for what?

What else is a good UX?

Oh, yeah, Privy and Google OAuth wallets.

These models cannot OAuth.

They don't know how to do any of that stuff, right?

It's actually much worse and harder for them, and you don't want it to do that.

You do not want this model to have your Google OAuth token because then it can just literally go into your Google and wreak havoc, right?

You don't want that.

You want it to just have a small amount of crypto in a wallet that's self-segregated and clear rules around what it can and cannot do, right?

So ironically, crypto has always had the UX that is perfect for AI agents in terms of exactly what is easy for them to parse and interact with.

And that's the sense in which I say crypto was designed for AIs.

We're now trying to backport

this ai first technology into becoming something civilized enough that humans can use it which means oh it's the privy model it's oh your money sitting in binance or coinbase it's extremely easy we remove the foot guns you know we have 2fa we have all this stuff that makes it easier and easier for you not to lose your shirt or make a mistake or get hacked but in principle you know in the agent or if you're on a computer you already know how to manage secrets

I mean, how do you think you use an API?

Every API that you've ever used has some kind of API secret, some kind of API key that a model's whole job is to safeguard as best as it possibly can.

So this idea that like, well, you know, human beings, we obviously screw up all the time.

It's not safe for us to hold on to money.