Henrietta Treyz

It's influenced not just the traditional independent voter that we are always concerned with, but also with young male and Hispanic voters who have driven the president to his second term.

So a lot to see here.

They are legal.

So at Border Patrol, one of the things that's questionable here is that the White House has said all these trade deals are still going to be intact.

You know, we've signed these agreements.

That is null and void.

Now, if you are an importer and you are at Customs and Border Patrol, you no longer.

longer will suffer paying for these tariffs.

The Supreme Court has told Customs and Border Patrol they can no longer collect them.

So this is a problem that the White House is going to have to address.

They have a number of trade deals that they have signed.

I believe there's about eight at this point, and many of them include a reciprocal tariff of 10 percent in the case of the UK or 19 percent in the case of Indonesia.

Those tariffs are illegal.

The Supreme Court has told the Customs and Border Patrol people this authority is not permitted.

So it's the importers who are going to rise up and say, I'm not paying.

It doesn't matter what the countries independently decide or whatever the White House says.

appreciate the question paul i am widely wildly out of consensus on this but what i just described on section 122 is just one of the many alternates and alternatives that the president has section 301 which is you know 350 billion dollars worth of tariffs on china we could re-up that

and apply it to the EU, the UK or Brazil.

All of those have been threatened.

But think about what functionally that means.