Howard Blum

I I I I I

.

.

.

.

.

.

What the defense... has to do at this point is to raise as many questions as possible. I say that even though every time the defense appears in the courtroom, Ann Taylor, the lead defense attorney, makes it a point of putting her arm rather internally even around Koberger and saying, I believe 100% in his innocence. And yet what she has to do, the dialectics of her case is to raise questions.

What the defense... has to do at this point is to raise as many questions as possible. I say that even though every time the defense appears in the courtroom, Ann Taylor, the lead defense attorney, makes it a point of putting her arm rather internally even around Koberger and saying, I believe 100% in his innocence. And yet what she has to do, the dialectics of her case is to raise questions.

What the defense... has to do at this point is to raise as many questions as possible. I say that even though every time the defense appears in the courtroom, Ann Taylor, the lead defense attorney, makes it a point of putting her arm rather internally even around Koberger and saying, I believe 100% in his innocence. And yet what she has to do, the dialectics of her case is to raise questions.

And unfortunately, for anyone who believes that Koberger is guilty, as I do, there are a lot of questions she can raise. The first one is, the Brady evidence, evidence that should have been given to the defense has not been given to them. This involves the forensic genetic material. They have not gotten all of it. They had to go to court. The prosecution was holding back.

And unfortunately, for anyone who believes that Koberger is guilty, as I do, there are a lot of questions she can raise. The first one is, the Brady evidence, evidence that should have been given to the defense has not been given to them. This involves the forensic genetic material. They have not gotten all of it. They had to go to court. The prosecution was holding back.

And unfortunately, for anyone who believes that Koberger is guilty, as I do, there are a lot of questions she can raise. The first one is, the Brady evidence, evidence that should have been given to the defense has not been given to them. This involves the forensic genetic material. They have not gotten all of it. They had to go to court. The prosecution was holding back.

Why the prosecution would hold back on this immediately raises questions. What are they trying to cover up? This is America. Give them everything. Let the jury see everything. given an excuse for the jury to have any doubts, but they've only given back some of it. What specifically they've given still remains under seal.

Why the prosecution would hold back on this immediately raises questions. What are they trying to cover up? This is America. Give them everything. Let the jury see everything. given an excuse for the jury to have any doubts, but they've only given back some of it. What specifically they've given still remains under seal.

Why the prosecution would hold back on this immediately raises questions. What are they trying to cover up? This is America. Give them everything. Let the jury see everything. given an excuse for the jury to have any doubts, but they've only given back some of it. What specifically they've given still remains under seal.

But I think this genetic information that the defense has is going to raise questions about when and how did the authorities know about Kohlberger?