Howard Blum

Well, how hard would it have been for the authorities to track down the fraternity boys who came in and out of the house and get blood samples from them? But to this day, two and a half years later, they still have not been able to identify the blood. When the judge heard this, he said in open court, are you saying that Kohlberger had other people working with him?

Well, how hard would it have been for the authorities to track down the fraternity boys who came in and out of the house and get blood samples from them? But to this day, two and a half years later, they still have not been able to identify the blood. When the judge heard this, he said in open court, are you saying that Kohlberger had other people working with him?

Well, how hard would it have been for the authorities to track down the fraternity boys who came in and out of the house and get blood samples from them? But to this day, two and a half years later, they still have not been able to identify the blood. When the judge heard this, he said in open court, are you saying that Kohlberger had other people working with him?

This doesn't mean Kohlberger wasn't involved, but there could have been accomplices. Accomplices, this throws out a new mystery into the case. And here is how Ann Taylor is using it. She says the real question is, how did the knife sheath get there? She is now going to argue in the course of the trial that these two unknown male, either one of them or both of them, put the knife sheath on the bed.

This doesn't mean Kohlberger wasn't involved, but there could have been accomplices. Accomplices, this throws out a new mystery into the case. And here is how Ann Taylor is using it. She says the real question is, how did the knife sheath get there? She is now going to argue in the course of the trial that these two unknown male, either one of them or both of them, put the knife sheath on the bed.

This doesn't mean Kohlberger wasn't involved, but there could have been accomplices. Accomplices, this throws out a new mystery into the case. And here is how Ann Taylor is using it. She says the real question is, how did the knife sheath get there? She is now going to argue in the course of the trial that these two unknown male, either one of them or both of them, put the knife sheath on the bed.

They were involved in the murder and Kohlberger, prior to the murder, had somehow innocently touched the knife sheath. The DNA on the knife sheath is just touch DNA. And she is claiming that or will claim at the trial that this was done innocently by Koberger. It's an argument that can raise a lot of doubts, I believe, in a jury's mind.

They were involved in the murder and Kohlberger, prior to the murder, had somehow innocently touched the knife sheath. The DNA on the knife sheath is just touch DNA. And she is claiming that or will claim at the trial that this was done innocently by Koberger. It's an argument that can raise a lot of doubts, I believe, in a jury's mind.

They were involved in the murder and Kohlberger, prior to the murder, had somehow innocently touched the knife sheath. The DNA on the knife sheath is just touch DNA. And she is claiming that or will claim at the trial that this was done innocently by Koberger. It's an argument that can raise a lot of doubts, I believe, in a jury's mind.

And the prospect that there could have been accomplices in the murder further complicates the case.

And the prospect that there could have been accomplices in the murder further complicates the case.

And the prospect that there could have been accomplices in the murder further complicates the case.

All I know is what was revealed in the court and the court referred to it as unknown males. And, you know, it seems that they can't track it down.

All I know is what was revealed in the court and the court referred to it as unknown males. And, you know, it seems that they can't track it down.

All I know is what was revealed in the court and the court referred to it as unknown males. And, you know, it seems that they can't track it down.

Well, I'll throw out a hypothesis, and again, it's just a hypothesis, and maybe it's a sketchy one, but I believe Kohlberger was guilty. I can't get around the cheek swab DNA that ties him there. So if he was out to commit the perfect crime, if he was a student of forensics, he could have taken a vial of blood with him. He could have put it on the banister. He could have taken a glove with blood

Well, I'll throw out a hypothesis, and again, it's just a hypothesis, and maybe it's a sketchy one, but I believe Kohlberger was guilty. I can't get around the cheek swab DNA that ties him there. So if he was out to commit the perfect crime, if he was a student of forensics, he could have taken a vial of blood with him. He could have put it on the banister. He could have taken a glove with blood

Well, I'll throw out a hypothesis, and again, it's just a hypothesis, and maybe it's a sketchy one, but I believe Kohlberger was guilty. I can't get around the cheek swab DNA that ties him there. So if he was out to commit the perfect crime, if he was a student of forensics, he could have taken a vial of blood with him. He could have put it on the banister. He could have taken a glove with blood

already embedded in it and left it at the crime scene. And he could have done this deliberately to put this police authorities to look for two other people. And he would have meanwhile been just gotten away with it. And it all would have worked if he hadn't left the knife sheath behind.

already embedded in it and left it at the crime scene. And he could have done this deliberately to put this police authorities to look for two other people. And he would have meanwhile been just gotten away with it. And it all would have worked if he hadn't left the knife sheath behind.