Howard Blum

And that's what they're trying to- All right, now wait, stand by, stand by.

the big questions coming not not you i know the defense is saying this the exact dates i mean the fbi has said they identified him on december 19th he became a person of interest and that was because of uh car license plate readings and then they still hadn't done the dna yet

the big questions coming not not you i know the defense is saying this the exact dates i mean the fbi has said they identified him on december 19th he became a person of interest and that was because of uh car license plate readings and then they still hadn't done the dna yet

the big questions coming not not you i know the defense is saying this the exact dates i mean the fbi has said they identified him on december 19th he became a person of interest and that was because of uh car license plate readings and then they still hadn't done the dna yet

I am saying that on approximately December 11th, that's when they first got aware of Kohlberger and everything else followed. It was the DNA that led the case and allowed them to track everything else down. And you see in the public affidavit at the time of the arrest, there's really no mention of the investigative genealogy work that was done.

I am saying that on approximately December 11th, that's when they first got aware of Kohlberger and everything else followed. It was the DNA that led the case and allowed them to track everything else down. And you see in the public affidavit at the time of the arrest, there's really no mention of the investigative genealogy work that was done.

I am saying that on approximately December 11th, that's when they first got aware of Kohlberger and everything else followed. It was the DNA that led the case and allowed them to track everything else down. And you see in the public affidavit at the time of the arrest, there's really no mention of the investigative genealogy work that was done.

And the prosecution would like to keep this all out of the case. They say it's irrelevant to how we made our case. But the defense, and I think that's a really good case, is saying, show it to us. What are you keeping secret? Why are you hiding this? And it's all going to be about confusing jurors. When you don't- No, wait.

And the prosecution would like to keep this all out of the case. They say it's irrelevant to how we made our case. But the defense, and I think that's a really good case, is saying, show it to us. What are you keeping secret? Why are you hiding this? And it's all going to be about confusing jurors. When you don't- No, wait.

And the prosecution would like to keep this all out of the case. They say it's irrelevant to how we made our case. But the defense, and I think that's a really good case, is saying, show it to us. What are you keeping secret? Why are you hiding this? And it's all going to be about confusing jurors. When you don't- No, wait.

And I would agree it was the Moscow police. The report is sent on the white Honda that the Washington state police, they sent it to Moscow. And what they do is they stick it in their file basically. And it sits there for several days until they get around to it. Then the FBI begins following him. And then the decision is made to get the confirming evidence they need.

And I would agree it was the Moscow police. The report is sent on the white Honda that the Washington state police, they sent it to Moscow. And what they do is they stick it in their file basically. And it sits there for several days until they get around to it. Then the FBI begins following him. And then the decision is made to get the confirming evidence they need.

And I would agree it was the Moscow police. The report is sent on the white Honda that the Washington state police, they sent it to Moscow. And what they do is they stick it in their file basically. And it sits there for several days until they get around to it. Then the FBI begins following him. And then the decision is made to get the confirming evidence they need.

This is just days before the arrest around December 27th, they steal garbage from the Koberger home, and that ties it to his father, but not to Koberger directly. The only direct DNA evidence that the prosecution has that was willing to admit on Koberger comes from after he's arrested. He's in the jail cell.

This is just days before the arrest around December 27th, they steal garbage from the Koberger home, and that ties it to his father, but not to Koberger directly. The only direct DNA evidence that the prosecution has that was willing to admit on Koberger comes from after he's arrested. He's in the jail cell.

This is just days before the arrest around December 27th, they steal garbage from the Koberger home, and that ties it to his father, but not to Koberger directly. The only direct DNA evidence that the prosecution has that was willing to admit on Koberger comes from after he's arrested. He's in the jail cell.

The first thing they do is take a cheek swab of the DNA, and then they compare that to the DNA that was found on the knife sheath. And that's when they're convinced they have their guy.

The first thing they do is take a cheek swab of the DNA, and then they compare that to the DNA that was found on the knife sheath. And that's when they're convinced they have their guy.

The first thing they do is take a cheek swab of the DNA, and then they compare that to the DNA that was found on the knife sheath. And that's when they're convinced they have their guy.

Yes, and that's what the defense is trying to get. And what's so interesting to me, and again, I'm a layman, I'm not a lawyer like you, but usually if you have your case, you give everything. Give the prosecution hands over everything. Let it all be out there. Let's not make an issue for the jury. Let them decide. Why are they holding this back? What are they holding back?