Ivette Fuentes

speaker
347 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Nov 2025 last heard 25 Nov

Ivette Fuentes’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
1 · Nov OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Nov 2025 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
I think they should be working on it because uh you find creative ways to overcome hurry.
hurdles and then you're successful.
Like example is LIGO, right?
At the beginning
There were so many sources of noise and then the community comes together
works together, you come up with new ideas on how to solve some of the problems, and there you go.
They detected gravitational waves.
So I'm very supportive of the experiment that they proposed and with the community following it.
But it is a difficult one.
But let's say like you you have this situation.
Now let's say that uh uh Diossi and and Roger are right and gravity collapses the wave function.
Right.
So they're never that doesn't mean that gravity is not quantum, but uh in my opinion, but they they're never going to be able to test that if gravity collapses a wave function because actually it happens uh uh at similar scales.
Uh-huh.
So uh if uh Roger is and and Yossi are correct and gravity collapses the wave function, boop, boop, they're going to uh you know collapse that superposition and then they won't see the effect proposed by Sugato and and Bosan and others.
But so but but that doesn't mean that what they're proposing is not there.
What just
would mean is that the scales at which this effect exists are still pushed uh to to to scales where there m is even more difficult to see, right?
Because the the scales where
Um Sugato says that these uh things would get ent entangled are the same as uh the ones we would expect to see the collapse of the wave function.
Showing 321–340 of 347 · page 17 of 18 ← Previous Next →