Jasmine Sun

speaker
827 appearances 2 recordings 1 series first heard Mar 2026 last heard 11 Sep

Jasmine Sun’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
1 · Sep OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 2 in all, peaking in Sep 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
Like in the Abdul race, like his number one, like,
hit on Haley Stevens is how much money she is getting from APAC, from DTE, from pharma or whatever.
And so one is just that I think we're in a political environment where making the numbers bigger and the amounts of money bigger makes people more suspicious, not less.
Another one I'll just quickly mention is I don't even think anthropics should be left off the hook for things like labor market impacts, right?
They are the ones simultaneously warning that we might see a, you
This is really important to us.
We're freaking out about it.
Dario has written in his essays, we might see an underclass of people of lower intellectual ability.
And they are building the agents.
They are building the coding agents, the banking agents, the design agents.
that they know are going to displace jobs, or they believe at least are going to displace jobs.
And I think that people feel that hypocrisy as well, which is if you are so worried about the inequality, why are you building the agents to do it?
And when I ask executives and researchers and whoever at Anthropic this question, they don't really have a good answer because it is true that their business model is fundamentally premised on the disruption that they say they are causing.
The idea of a permanent underclass caused by AI is basically a world where any job a person can do, either AI or a robot can do for them, which means that workers lose all the economic leverage they have.
And capital owners, people with money, can simply pay machine labor to do all the work instead of paying workers.
What that means is anyone who earned their living by working is no longer able to do that.
You end up with a world of runaway inequality where the rich get richer and the working class gets poorer.
Maybe they get some welfare checks.
But fundamentally, it's a loss of economic mobility in a society.
And when I asked folks in Silicon Valley, do you think by default AI is going to increase or decrease inequality?
Showing 261–280 of 827 · page 14 of 42 ← Previous Next →