Jasmine Sun

Because like if AI is way better than you have something, you should use it for that thing.

Like I use ChatGPT for research, like transcript generation.

Sometimes I'll ask for feedback, like all the time.

If AI is better than you have something, I think that oftentimes you should use it and take advantage of that.

But the other thing is when I experiment a lot with AI, I really see the jagged edges.

I see the things it's not good enough yet at.

Like it cannot do a podcast like this.

It cannot have a conversation.

It cannot build trust with an interview source and get them to share their feelings about stuff.

It can't go places in the physical world and describe like what it likes, what it is like to be in a place.

So a lot of my writing is kind of like scene based and quote unquote anthropological.

And I think that is

more interesting to people in a world where AI can just get facts off the internet.

Like, I read the facts off the internet, but what I can do is I can actually stand next to a data center and see what it sounds like and interview the people around it and say, what do you think of this thing?

And so I would probably spend a lot of time not just experimenting, but also asking, what is my personal comparative advantage as a human against the AI?

And how can I really invest in that?

Because that's what is going to be robust as AI gets better and better.

Thank you both.

Yeah, love the conversation.

That's great.