Jason Buttrell
speaker
211 appearances
6 recordings
1 series
first heard Feb 2025
last heard 11 May
Jason Buttrell’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 4 in all, peaking in May 2026 with 2.
Appearances
Well, that's what they're setting up because they've said, oh, but if you give him cause to do the disruptive things he wants to do. Exactly right. They just gave the director of the FBI cause to start cleaning.
And he's been eerily quiet.
Correct. Just a blanket, you know, the FBI is withholding documents doesn't make sense with Kash Patel as the director, because he's already seen if we're going off of his statements, he's already seen it. He knows it and he has vowed to release it. So it's that's got to be knocked off.
Yeah, and I think that kind of goes towards point three, right? Because if they know how New York's going to respond on this, that field office, they're just pushing them into the corner to react how they know they're going to react.
Yeah. Well, I mean, but she immediately deflected because they knew there was going to be outrage on this because this is one of our main issues on the base is the Epstein files. Yes. She immediately directed all that rage towards one specific point, New York.
One, to deflect. To deflect, which would work with the one I just described. But two, to set off point three.
I think that's kind of a big thing as well.
I've seen that being floated around a lot, and especially yesterday on X. I spent years doing intelligence, actual intelligence operations. I'm going to go full on conspiracy here. I've seen how misinformation and disinformation works. I was warning people that once information started coming out listing random names, like, oh, my God, let's tie every single name to Epstein.
That was a big up, in my opinion. The fact that she was not involved, but just the fact that they're like, oh, look, Rihanna was at a party. She's on the list. Well, no, she's not. I mean, she could be eventually. I don't know. But she's not on the list. More like a victim.
Well, in my opinion, that's a big distraction. That is to blow it up to make it look like it's this vast right-wing conspiracy and hide the fact of what was really going on. What was really going on? I don't know. But we know that members of the Royal Family were involved. We know, I'm going to say this again, that the CIA director... Well, at least twice. When to meet with Jeffrey Epstein?
He does not do that on some random dude that they've charged for a crime that didn't exist. Why would the CIA director meet with Jeffrey Epstein?
Yeah. Before I address that, I would like to say that the fact that the potential of World War III made the after show. It's amazing. What the hell was being talked about in the other three hours?
In a Glenn Beck radio show.
I will say with the rare earth minerals things, I think it's genius on a couple different levels. On one, he's bringing out into the open exactly what the Democrats have been after since 2014 and before. So now he's laying out on the table No more secret, okay? Yeah, yeah. This is what the establishment on my side wants. Now, will it benefit this side of the party as well? Sure.
But let's just put all of our cards out on the table. That is how you negotiate. Not by holding in a little secret compartment, which I'm not saying you have one of those at your poker table, like at the ranch. Shh. I'm not saying that exists. Yeah. But there's no secret little thing out here. What? Oh, don't worry about it, Stu. Don't worry about it. Come play poker with us.
So you're just putting all the cards on the table. That's how negotiations are done. But he's also doing something else. He's signaling to Putin, look, I'm not hiding anything here. Yeah. This is all about interests, right?
So if you want to deal with us, you're dealing with hard-nosed geopolitical interests, right? Yes. There's nothing else here at stake but that. Now you can come to the negotiating table and offer me something.
Uh, And I will say that this is not revolutionary thought here. This is the way foreign policy, things like that, used to be done. It's just post-Cold War, we shifted into this hazy, like, no, we're doing this because we're the most righteous nation on the planet, even though we're also cool with the Saudis and Erdogan and Turkey, I think. It's just about interest here. It's transparency.
It's transparency, and you also do a negotiation by recognizing that both sides have interests in this thing. You do not do a negotiation when you have the UN, which we all know is ridiculous anyway and worthless, but when every single year they're going to do this ceremonial vote, which they just had again, where they say, let's condemn Russia for their invasion again. But why? Why?
We're doing it again. Okay, but why? Does it have anything at all to do with there's certain sides of people at the table that now are looking for peace and not war? Yes. Oh, crap. I wasn't supposed to say that. No, no, no. We're just going to do it again.
Showing 161–180 of 211 · page 9 of 11
← Previous
Next →