Javier Milei
๐ค PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
They realized that those on the Western side were much better off. And of course, to prevent people from leaving. They put, what a wonderful system, right? So, I mean, they had to trap people. They couldn't let them go. I mean, these are such wonderful ideas that they had to apply them at gunpoint. It's quite, well, it's no coincidence that they killed 150 million human beings.
They realized that those on the Western side were much better off. And of course, to prevent people from leaving. They put, what a wonderful system, right? So, I mean, they had to trap people. They couldn't let them go. I mean, these are such wonderful ideas that they had to apply them at gunpoint. It's quite, well, it's no coincidence that they killed 150 million human beings.
So what happened then? The official fall of the wall in the year 1989 made it clear that socialism had failed. In that context, the socialists, they moved the discussion of class struggle in economics and took it to other areas. So, for example, socialism or what is of the 21st century or cultural Marxism or post-Marxism, whatever definition you want, is to take class struggle
So what happened then? The official fall of the wall in the year 1989 made it clear that socialism had failed. In that context, the socialists, they moved the discussion of class struggle in economics and took it to other areas. So, for example, socialism or what is of the 21st century or cultural Marxism or post-Marxism, whatever definition you want, is to take class struggle
So what happened then? The official fall of the wall in the year 1989 made it clear that socialism had failed. In that context, the socialists, they moved the discussion of class struggle in economics and took it to other areas. So, for example, socialism or what is of the 21st century or cultural Marxism or post-Marxism, whatever definition you want, is to take class struggle
to different aspects of life. For example, one of the aspects of life where you, let's say, have this is in gender ideology. I mean, it's incredible because the first ones to defend equality before the law were the liberals. The first to defend women's rights were the liberals. Jeremy Bentham in the year 1750 was the first to demand equality before the law for women. I mean, the cause of equality
to different aspects of life. For example, one of the aspects of life where you, let's say, have this is in gender ideology. I mean, it's incredible because the first ones to defend equality before the law were the liberals. The first to defend women's rights were the liberals. Jeremy Bentham in the year 1750 was the first to demand equality before the law for women. I mean, the cause of equality
to different aspects of life. For example, one of the aspects of life where you, let's say, have this is in gender ideology. I mean, it's incredible because the first ones to defend equality before the law were the liberals. The first to defend women's rights were the liberals. Jeremy Bentham in the year 1750 was the first to demand equality before the law for women. I mean, the cause of equality
Equality before the law for women and equality of rights. The first ones who advocated for this were the liberals, did you know? However, what does the left do? They just go on to radicalize it. And then it moves to what is called female chauvinism. Female chauvinism is, let's say, the fight against males. And then, I mean, how do they do it? They do it by assigning rights.
Equality before the law for women and equality of rights. The first ones who advocated for this were the liberals, did you know? However, what does the left do? They just go on to radicalize it. And then it moves to what is called female chauvinism. Female chauvinism is, let's say, the fight against males. And then, I mean, how do they do it? They do it by assigning rights.
Equality before the law for women and equality of rights. The first ones who advocated for this were the liberals, did you know? However, what does the left do? They just go on to radicalize it. And then it moves to what is called female chauvinism. Female chauvinism is, let's say, the fight against males. And then, I mean, how do they do it? They do it by assigning rights.
But when you assign a right, someone has to pay for it. And that has consequences. And in general, let's say this always happens. The consequences are that the results are worse than what you had before. I mean, in any state intervention, the subsequent result is is often worse than what you originally had. So that's one thing.
But when you assign a right, someone has to pay for it. And that has consequences. And in general, let's say this always happens. The consequences are that the results are worse than what you had before. I mean, in any state intervention, the subsequent result is is often worse than what you originally had. So that's one thing.
But when you assign a right, someone has to pay for it. And that has consequences. And in general, let's say this always happens. The consequences are that the results are worse than what you had before. I mean, in any state intervention, the subsequent result is is often worse than what you originally had. So that's one thing.
And not only that, but the other side of this is the environmental agenda, which sets man against nature, involving all aspects of environmentalism and everything related to climate change, In other words, they can't stand any serious discussion, therefore all environmental policies are nothing more than an excuse to collect taxes.
And not only that, but the other side of this is the environmental agenda, which sets man against nature, involving all aspects of environmentalism and everything related to climate change, In other words, they can't stand any serious discussion, therefore all environmental policies are nothing more than an excuse to collect taxes.
And not only that, but the other side of this is the environmental agenda, which sets man against nature, involving all aspects of environmentalism and everything related to climate change, In other words, they can't stand any serious discussion, therefore all environmental policies are nothing more than an excuse to collect taxes.
So that a group of parasitic bureaucrats can live at the expense of others and finance sinister ideas. Where the most sinister idea of all is that there is no room for everyone on planet Earth.
So that a group of parasitic bureaucrats can live at the expense of others and finance sinister ideas. Where the most sinister idea of all is that there is no room for everyone on planet Earth.
So that a group of parasitic bureaucrats can live at the expense of others and finance sinister ideas. Where the most sinister idea of all is that there is no room for everyone on planet Earth.