Jeremy Corbell

Which is... Actually, I'm just curious if you agree.

I'm not an all-source analyst.

You had previous knowledge of this video.

This is the video that people did not want me and George to put out.

And they didn't because the sentiment is... And let's see if it stands the test of time, which it has so far.

That what we are seeing is something...

That we don't have the capability to do.

You're having a clear demonstration of an object performing instantaneous acceleration where G-forces would normally turn a human body into jello and juice.

Yep.

And even structurally.

you would have with most material science, you would have an explosion from that type of instantaneous because of what we call inertia, which I had to look up the word to really remember what it means.

I've looked it up 50 times over the last year.

So inertial effect.

So I just got a question as an all source analyst who not only put this in the UAP category, but additionally ordered a visual analysis of it within the intelligence community that is now public.

What in the world do you speculate we are seeing?

Okay.

And then last question on that.

If you can't tell me what it is because we don't know what UAP actually are to some degree, can you just plainly tell our audience what they're not seeing, what it isn't?

Can you give me a list?

It's the first observable.