Jesse Michels

But again, it just doesn't explain how these things show up

you know, during certain states and in these sort of synchronistic ways.

And then the meta thing is, like, are we constantly... Are we conflating what is probably a zoo of phenomena?

And that's probably the answer.

Like, the answer is likely not, oh, once you open...

your sensors, your epistemic aperture, like what you can see, you see like one thing that explains all these phenomena or whatever.

There's one epiphenomena that explains the low level phenomena, like probably not, right?

Like you could be seeing survivors of an ancient cataclysm that are hiding underneath our oceans.

You could see like this, like, you know, orb, like, you know, they're engaging in like nuclear game theory, like, you know, holding back like the nukes or whatever and doing recon on us.

You could see space aliens.

You could see all these different things.

I'm like, you know, I don't know.

you know, you'd have to somehow probability weight these things.

You have to create some sort of infographic and map and think about these in like Bayesian sort of probabilistic ways.

And I think the people, there's no one doing that.

Like everybody's stuck on this like first base, like alien, not alien.

And like the deeper thinkers are like, we don't even, like that's the wrong framework.

Like we don't even know.

We just know that there's like all these empirical anomalies that we have to study.

So I'm really high conviction on the Townsend Brown anti-gravity stuff.