Jessica Rose
speaker
147 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Nov 2024
Jessica Rose’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
um say okay yes we solved the dna the residual dna problem i don't personally i don't think they can because of why it actually got in there which is because of rna dna high formation they have been trying to mediate this problem since 2021 we also have a document that proves that so they've been trying moderna's done a better job according to kevin mccernan but uh I would push back on that.
I think that this is the doorway into removing this entire platform from the market. So, yeah. And can I comment about the cardiac thing as well?
Hold on. Hold on one second. One quick second. I'll get Craig's response to the first thing and then we'll go to cardiac. Go ahead.
Just today, I reposted a little Senate hearing with Alex Antic, who's a senator in Australia. asking one, I think his first name is John Skerritt, yes, who is a professor, I'm not sure what he's a professor of, about the death of a seven-year-old and a nine-year-old Australian children due to cardiac arrest in temporal proximity to getting the COVID jabs.
And the guy said, the professor John Skerritt said that it was more common than people think dying children, prepubescent children dying of cardiac arrest, which is false. And that there's no linked signal in terms of adverse event reports in pharmacovigilance databases to the COVID shots. You know, of course, I had to go right away and prove him wrong on both counts.
There's data from the TGA that proves there's no reports of cardiac arrest in prepubescent children like that. And in VAERS, there are thousands of reports of cardiac arrest. We're not talking about myocarditis or any other cardiovascular issues. We're talking about cardiac arrest leading to death. There are thousands of them. And just to give you some statistics here...
in terms of temporality, 32% of those reports were reported within 24 hours, 38% within 48, and 52% of all the cardiac arrest reports were reported within seven days. So this is Absolutely.
I want to put a little finer point on that. If you remember in the Pfizer research, the original study, they eliminated the first two weeks. The first two weeks didn't exist. Anybody lost in those two weeks were just blinded to the study. Interesting. Number one. And then number two, last time we were together, Jessica, we were with Dr. Joseph Freiman, who was pointing out a doctor.
He was describing such a case of an eight-year-old or a 10-year-old who died immediately following the vaccine to the team at FDA, whose response at the time was, oh, well, I guess it must have fallen through the cracks. And by the way, still no response last I checked.
Yeah. Senator Antic was like very polite, probably more polite than I would have been. And Claire, you guys both know what I'm going to say here. The response to hearing about the possibility that a therapeutic product that the children didn't need killed them is just like...
there's just no emotional response and they don't even attempt to engage the possibility that there is a causal relationship. And the data really, really demonstrates that there is. And every single person knows by now they've heard somebody suffering from the shots or suffered themselves. I mean, this, this is, it's not a secret anymore. It's, it's, it's, um,
It's preposterous that anybody would sit there and deny the possibility. Let's just put it that way.
And then you want to tell us some thoughts on the myocardial mechanism, the mechanism of myocarditis or something. You said you wanted to comment on that.
Yeah, no, I think Claire summed it up beautifully, and I agree with her. I mean, the molecular mimicry doesn't just apply to the cardiac tissue. There are peptides in that spike protein for which there are human homologues and peptides. We can have the immune system attacking anywhere. There's even a paper out there that demonstrates that it can attack immune system cells. So this is really bad.
I'm going to ask you to speculate even further. Is it possible that some of that was constructed in the lab, so to speak, to sort of have this as a bioweapon with a maximal downstream effect?
Yes, and the reason I'm saying yes emphatically three times is because there's no way that the people who designed the spike protein, it was designed and it was codon optimized, didn't run that stuff through the various bioinformatics softwares to predict whether or not there were amyloidogenic peptides, which there are, whether there was a super antigen site, which it's been documented there is, whether or not there were...
many homologs to human proteins in there. There are.
Jessica, we know what you mean. You have to explain that to the public at large. All that needs to be deconstructed for people just simply, if you can. Homologs, codons, those are the words people don't know.
All right. Forget about the codon optimization. You guys don't need to know about that for this. But basically, everybody knows that the sequence for the spike, it's a sequence of letters, which are... which are encoded by nucleotides. So a peptide is just a shorter sequence of like within that spike protein.
So if you chop that up into little bits, let's just say, for example, some of those little bits, have exact, it's the same sequence in human protein, if you're catching my drift. So they're not similar, they're exact. There's like 100% sequence homology. So if you can imagine- Let's back away from that.
Showing 61–80 of 147 · page 4 of 8
← Previous
Next →